If the courts never make mistakes, so that there is no uncertainty about the negligence rule, potential injurers always meets the due care standard and are never liable. But casual empiricism and economic research provide evidence that the courts make mistakes in applying the negligence rule. We ask whether, as intuition suggests, the possibility of legal errors is a reason people buy liability insurance. We analyze the behavior of the potential injurer, the potential victim and the insurer. We show that, in equilibrium, potential victims sue with positive probability and potential injurers buy insurance, but purchase less than full coverage
We incorporate the concept of evidentiary standard to the analysis of the negligence rule under liab...
Liability insurance, of one form or another, is the typical means by which victims of negligence are...
An injurer avoids liability in negligence when any one of the ingredients of negligence is absent. A...
If the legal system operates perfectly in applying the negligence rule, potential injurers always me...
We analyze the efficiency properties of the negligence rule with liability insurance, when the tort-...
Law and economics scholars have written extensively about how insurance markets affect the tort syst...
The negligence-versus–strict liability debate is over in tort law, and negligence has clearly won. Y...
We analyze liability rules in a setting where injurers are potentially insolvent and where negligenc...
This paper examines the effect of tort rules on behavior if people are optimistic or insensitive rel...
We analyze liability rules in a setting where injurers are potentially insolvent and where negligenc...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
This article compares the classic liability rules, negligence and strict liability, under the hypoth...
In important areas like medical malpractice and environmental torts, injurers are potentially insolv...
Two related trends have created novel challenges for managing risk in the United States. The first t...
This paper analyzes liability rules, when agents, both the potential injurer and the potential victi...
We incorporate the concept of evidentiary standard to the analysis of the negligence rule under liab...
Liability insurance, of one form or another, is the typical means by which victims of negligence are...
An injurer avoids liability in negligence when any one of the ingredients of negligence is absent. A...
If the legal system operates perfectly in applying the negligence rule, potential injurers always me...
We analyze the efficiency properties of the negligence rule with liability insurance, when the tort-...
Law and economics scholars have written extensively about how insurance markets affect the tort syst...
The negligence-versus–strict liability debate is over in tort law, and negligence has clearly won. Y...
We analyze liability rules in a setting where injurers are potentially insolvent and where negligenc...
This paper examines the effect of tort rules on behavior if people are optimistic or insensitive rel...
We analyze liability rules in a setting where injurers are potentially insolvent and where negligenc...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
This article compares the classic liability rules, negligence and strict liability, under the hypoth...
In important areas like medical malpractice and environmental torts, injurers are potentially insolv...
Two related trends have created novel challenges for managing risk in the United States. The first t...
This paper analyzes liability rules, when agents, both the potential injurer and the potential victi...
We incorporate the concept of evidentiary standard to the analysis of the negligence rule under liab...
Liability insurance, of one form or another, is the typical means by which victims of negligence are...
An injurer avoids liability in negligence when any one of the ingredients of negligence is absent. A...