Add to ORKGUpdating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
BACKGROUND The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed...
High quality up-to-date systematic reviews are essential in order to help healthcare practitioners a...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Updating systematic reviews is, in general, more efficient than starting afresh when new evidence em...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
We conducted a workshop at the EAHIL 2022 Conference which aimed to identify best practice when upda...
Updating diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews (SRs) is fundamental in order to avoid ma...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing ...
Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare p...
Systematic reviews and systematic maps aim to provide an overview of the best available evidence to ...
Systematic reviews identify, summarise and synthesise evidence relevant to specific research questio...
Background: National Clinical Guidelines are systematically developed statements, based on a thoroug...
A living systematic review (LSR) should keep the review current as new research evidence emerges. An...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
BACKGROUND The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed...
High quality up-to-date systematic reviews are essential in order to help healthcare practitioners a...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Updating systematic reviews is, in general, more efficient than starting afresh when new evidence em...
Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evi...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
We conducted a workshop at the EAHIL 2022 Conference which aimed to identify best practice when upda...
Updating diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) systematic reviews (SRs) is fundamental in order to avoid ma...
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing ...
Systematic reviews (SRs) should be up to date to maintain their importance in informing healthcare p...
Systematic reviews and systematic maps aim to provide an overview of the best available evidence to ...
Systematic reviews identify, summarise and synthesise evidence relevant to specific research questio...
Background: National Clinical Guidelines are systematically developed statements, based on a thoroug...
A living systematic review (LSR) should keep the review current as new research evidence emerges. An...
Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review...
BACKGROUND The covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the role of living systematic reviews. The speed...
High quality up-to-date systematic reviews are essential in order to help healthcare practitioners a...