International audienceRecently several multicast mechanisms were proposed that scale better with the number of multicast groups than traditional multicast does. These proposals are known as small group multicast (SGM) or explicit multicast (Xcast). Explicit multicast protocols, such as the Xcast protocol, encode the list of group members in the Xcast header of every packet. If the number of members in a group increases, routers may need to fragment an Xcast packet. Fragmented packets may not be identified as Xcast packets by routers. In this paper, we show that the Xcast protocol does not support the IP fragmentation. We show also that avoiding fragmentation limits the group size that can be handled by the Xcast protocol. First, we describe...
Recently several multicast mechanisms [3], known as small group multicast, were proposed that scale ...
With the globalisation of the multimedia entertainment industry and the popularity of streaming and ...
Multicast is a communication abstract in which a source sends messages to a group of destinations. G...
International audienceRecently several multicast mechanisms were proposed that scale better with the...
Abstract—We find that current group communications protocols are far from “one size fits all, ” they...
Multicast is not scalable mainly due to the number of forwarding states and control overhead require...
We describe a new application-layer multicast protocol that is specifically designed to scale to l...
International audienceTraditional IP Multicast has been proposed in order to manage group communicat...
International audienceDue to the complexity and poor scalability, IP Multicast has not been used on ...
The fast growth of telecommunication networks requires an important evolution of routing protocols. ...
Deering's model of Internet group communication, in spite of its simplicity and elegance, impos...
Existing multicast routing mechanisms were intended for use within regions where a group is widely r...
Abstract — Typically, multicast data distribution uses rendezvous points (PIM, CBT), multicast distr...
Deering's model of Internet group communication, in spite of its simplicity and elegance, imposes li...
Recently several multicast mechanisms [3], known as small group multicast, were proposed that scale ...
With the globalisation of the multimedia entertainment industry and the popularity of streaming and ...
Multicast is a communication abstract in which a source sends messages to a group of destinations. G...
International audienceRecently several multicast mechanisms were proposed that scale better with the...
Abstract—We find that current group communications protocols are far from “one size fits all, ” they...
Multicast is not scalable mainly due to the number of forwarding states and control overhead require...
We describe a new application-layer multicast protocol that is specifically designed to scale to l...
International audienceTraditional IP Multicast has been proposed in order to manage group communicat...
International audienceDue to the complexity and poor scalability, IP Multicast has not been used on ...
The fast growth of telecommunication networks requires an important evolution of routing protocols. ...
Deering's model of Internet group communication, in spite of its simplicity and elegance, impos...
Existing multicast routing mechanisms were intended for use within regions where a group is widely r...
Abstract — Typically, multicast data distribution uses rendezvous points (PIM, CBT), multicast distr...
Deering's model of Internet group communication, in spite of its simplicity and elegance, imposes li...
Recently several multicast mechanisms [3], known as small group multicast, were proposed that scale ...
With the globalisation of the multimedia entertainment industry and the popularity of streaming and ...
Multicast is a communication abstract in which a source sends messages to a group of destinations. G...