This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Groupe Steria SCA (Case C-386/14),1 in respect of which the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) delivered its decision on 2 September 2015, following the Opinion of Advocate General Kokott of 11 June 2015.2 The decision, which has also been the subject of an ECJ Press Release,3 further interprets the freedom of establishment in the context of the French intégration fiscale and clarifies that taxpayers can claim some benefits of a group taxation regime even if EU law would not allow for the full benefit of such a regime. It also confirms that an option granted to Member States under secondary EU legislation cannot justify a breach of the fundame...
In this case note, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in MK v. Autoridade Tributári...
The Court’s decision in Société Générale reinforces established case law that EU law neither prohibi...
This Opinion Statement was prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force. It concerns X (Case C-283/15), in res...
This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force1 on Case C-386/14, in which the 2nd ...
The Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the Court’s clarification that cross-border company...
This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on SECIL (Case C-464/14), in which t...
peer reviewedThis is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Eqiom (Case C-6/16),...
peer reviewedThe Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the precise and instructive decision i...
The Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the ECJ’s decision in the case, which strongly affi...
peer reviewedThis CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the EU Institutions on 10 October 2019, commen...
peer reviewedIn this CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the EU Institutions in June 2023, the CFE E...
The CFE welcomes this decision in that it marks a new page in the protection of taxpayer rights. In ...
"This CFE OS, submitted to the EU Institutions in May 2018, addresses the ECJ's decision in Eqiom (C...
This Opinion Statement analyses the Court's decision in Joined Cases C‑39/13, C‑40/13 and C‑41/13, S...
In this CFE Opinion Statement, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the decision of 27 January 2022 in...
In this case note, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in MK v. Autoridade Tributári...
The Court’s decision in Société Générale reinforces established case law that EU law neither prohibi...
This Opinion Statement was prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force. It concerns X (Case C-283/15), in res...
This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force1 on Case C-386/14, in which the 2nd ...
The Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the Court’s clarification that cross-border company...
This is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on SECIL (Case C-464/14), in which t...
peer reviewedThis is an Opinion Statement prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force on Eqiom (Case C-6/16),...
peer reviewedThe Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the precise and instructive decision i...
The Confédération Fiscale Européenne welcomes the ECJ’s decision in the case, which strongly affi...
peer reviewedThis CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the EU Institutions on 10 October 2019, commen...
peer reviewedIn this CFE Opinion Statement, submitted to the EU Institutions in June 2023, the CFE E...
The CFE welcomes this decision in that it marks a new page in the protection of taxpayer rights. In ...
"This CFE OS, submitted to the EU Institutions in May 2018, addresses the ECJ's decision in Eqiom (C...
This Opinion Statement analyses the Court's decision in Joined Cases C‑39/13, C‑40/13 and C‑41/13, S...
In this CFE Opinion Statement, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the decision of 27 January 2022 in...
In this case note, the CFE ECJ Task Force comments on the ECJ decision in MK v. Autoridade Tributári...
The Court’s decision in Société Générale reinforces established case law that EU law neither prohibi...
This Opinion Statement was prepared by the CFE ECJ Task Force. It concerns X (Case C-283/15), in res...