Subgroup analysis is often conducted as a post-hoc evaluation of clinical trials. The aim of a subgroup analysis is the evaluation of the treatment effect that was tested in the trial, in a specific subgroups of patients. It can be run both on positive trials (to provide information about patients receiving the highest benefit from the treatment) and on negative trials (to test whether the treatment that had no effect on the overall population can be of any benefit in a specific subset of patients). A subgroup analysis is aimed at generating hypotheses for future research. Subgroup analyses have statistical challenges involving multiple testing and unplanned and low powered analyses; however the main issue, at least in subgroup analysis con...
Abstract Analysis of subgroup results in a clinical trial is surprisingly unreliable, even in a larg...
Background: A subgroup of clinical trial subjects identified by baseline characteristics is a proper...
BackgroundWhen subgroup analyses are not correctly analyzed and reported, incorrect conclusions may ...
Abstract Background Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions ...
In observational studies, identification of associations within particular subgroups is the usual me...
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions differ b...
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions differ b...
Background A subgroup of clinical trial subjects identified by baseline characterist...
Clinicians, when trying to apply trial results to patient care, need to individualize patient care a...
Contains fulltext : 171557.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: It ...
Results of subgroup analysis (SA) reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) cannot be adequately ...
Background: It is well recognized that treatment effects may not be homogeneous across the study pop...
Large pragmatic trials provide the most reliable data about the effects of treatments, but should be...
Results of subgroup analysis (SA) reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) cannot be adequately ...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for the identification and esti...
Abstract Analysis of subgroup results in a clinical trial is surprisingly unreliable, even in a larg...
Background: A subgroup of clinical trial subjects identified by baseline characteristics is a proper...
BackgroundWhen subgroup analyses are not correctly analyzed and reported, incorrect conclusions may ...
Abstract Background Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions ...
In observational studies, identification of associations within particular subgroups is the usual me...
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions differ b...
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analyses in randomized trials examine whether effects of interventions differ b...
Background A subgroup of clinical trial subjects identified by baseline characterist...
Clinicians, when trying to apply trial results to patient care, need to individualize patient care a...
Contains fulltext : 171557.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: It ...
Results of subgroup analysis (SA) reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) cannot be adequately ...
Background: It is well recognized that treatment effects may not be homogeneous across the study pop...
Large pragmatic trials provide the most reliable data about the effects of treatments, but should be...
Results of subgroup analysis (SA) reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) cannot be adequately ...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for the identification and esti...
Abstract Analysis of subgroup results in a clinical trial is surprisingly unreliable, even in a larg...
Background: A subgroup of clinical trial subjects identified by baseline characteristics is a proper...
BackgroundWhen subgroup analyses are not correctly analyzed and reported, incorrect conclusions may ...