Add to ORKG- To understand what meta-analyses and systematic reviews are, why we should use them, and how to interpret their results. - To describe the practical steps of doing a meta-analysis. - To show some examples of meta-analyses in public health research. - To discuss meta-analysis conceptual and statistical limitations
Properly conducted meta-analyses that are based on systematic reviews of the literature allow the co...
Meta-analysis is a subset of systematic reviewa technique for systematically combining pertinent qua...
Systematic reviews, which can include a meta-analysis, are considered the gold standard for determin...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly popular study designs in clinical research. A ...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for a more transparent and objective appraisal of the evi...
Meta-analyses overcome the limitation of small sample sizes or rare outcomes by pooling results from...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd In evidence-based medicine, meta-analyses are often considered to provide an exc...
"n "n "nAbstract: "nIn contrast to traditional reviews, systematic reviews explore theliterature on ...
A systematic review is an overview of primary studies that used explicit and reproducible methods. A...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses now form a major source of evidence on clinical effectiveness, ...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses now form a major source of evidence on clinical effectiveness, ...
Properly conducted meta-analyses that are based on systematic reviews of the literature allow the co...
Meta-analysis is a subset of systematic reviewa technique for systematically combining pertinent qua...
Systematic reviews, which can include a meta-analysis, are considered the gold standard for determin...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly popular study designs in clinical research. A ...
Systematic reviews can help practitioners keep abreast of the medical literature by summarizing larg...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for a more transparent and objective appraisal of the evi...
Meta-analyses overcome the limitation of small sample sizes or rare outcomes by pooling results from...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
Objectives: Systematic reviews are one of the major building blocks of evidence-based medicine. This...
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd In evidence-based medicine, meta-analyses are often considered to provide an exc...
"n "n "nAbstract: "nIn contrast to traditional reviews, systematic reviews explore theliterature on ...
A systematic review is an overview of primary studies that used explicit and reproducible methods. A...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses now form a major source of evidence on clinical effectiveness, ...
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses now form a major source of evidence on clinical effectiveness, ...
Properly conducted meta-analyses that are based on systematic reviews of the literature allow the co...
Meta-analysis is a subset of systematic reviewa technique for systematically combining pertinent qua...
Systematic reviews, which can include a meta-analysis, are considered the gold standard for determin...