There are many metrics for ranking Journals and Researchers. Most metrics are based on the number of citations and classifies Journals based on them. Current metrics have problems, e.g., for ranking new science branches, they allocate them a low ranking by mistake. In this paper, the authors will introduce a new metric entitled “Novelty Rate” in order to rank authors, papers and journals. This metric is an independent metric and it is not proposed as an alternative for impact factor or other scientific journal rankings, but with the purpose to complete them
This paper explores the complex relationship between scientific novelty and technological impact. We...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
Emerging metrics based on article-level does not exclude traditional metrics based on citations to t...
There are many metrics for ranking Journals and Researchers. Most metrics are based on the number of...
Trabajo presentado a la Science, Technology and Innovation indicators (STI) Conference, celebrada en...
Citation counts have long been considered as the primary bibliographic indicator for evaluating the ...
Research which explores unchartered waters has a high potential for major impact but also carries a ...
The raw data are divided into two parts: one is the ten year citation data of the top journal (D1.ra...
Measuring novel science as publications which make new combinations of referenced journals and measu...
Since the proposition of Journal Impact Factor [1] in 1963, the classical citation-based ranking sch...
To take into account the different bibliometric features of science fields and the different size of...
Quantifying the impact of scientific research is almost always controversial, and there is a need fo...
A new size-independent indicator of scientific journal prestige, the SJR2 indicator, is proposed. Th...
Journal-Ranking.com is perhaps the first online journal ranking system in the world which allows any...
Evaluating scientific research is crucial for the academic community and the society at large. To ra...
This paper explores the complex relationship between scientific novelty and technological impact. We...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
Emerging metrics based on article-level does not exclude traditional metrics based on citations to t...
There are many metrics for ranking Journals and Researchers. Most metrics are based on the number of...
Trabajo presentado a la Science, Technology and Innovation indicators (STI) Conference, celebrada en...
Citation counts have long been considered as the primary bibliographic indicator for evaluating the ...
Research which explores unchartered waters has a high potential for major impact but also carries a ...
The raw data are divided into two parts: one is the ten year citation data of the top journal (D1.ra...
Measuring novel science as publications which make new combinations of referenced journals and measu...
Since the proposition of Journal Impact Factor [1] in 1963, the classical citation-based ranking sch...
To take into account the different bibliometric features of science fields and the different size of...
Quantifying the impact of scientific research is almost always controversial, and there is a need fo...
A new size-independent indicator of scientific journal prestige, the SJR2 indicator, is proposed. Th...
Journal-Ranking.com is perhaps the first online journal ranking system in the world which allows any...
Evaluating scientific research is crucial for the academic community and the society at large. To ra...
This paper explores the complex relationship between scientific novelty and technological impact. We...
<div><p>There are now many methods available to assess the relative citation performance of peer-rev...
Emerging metrics based on article-level does not exclude traditional metrics based on citations to t...