International audienceLaw as integrity as a dworkinian theory is mainly a theory of legal argumentation.The judicial argumentation is controversial and not a theoretical demonstration. It aims at the discovery of one best legal answer as far as legal disagreements are not merely verbel but genuine disagreements: they are argumentatin around different conceptions of the same concept. But the proposition of one best legal answer never would have the consequence to stop the process or argumentation
The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century,...
Bourcier Danièle. Argumentation et définition en droit. In: Langages, 10ᵉ année, n°42, 1976. Argumen...
International audienceIntuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this pape...
International audienceLaw as integrity as a dworkinian theory is mainly a theory of legal argumentat...
Dworkin's theory is basically an expression of the rule of law doctrine, since it holds that the exi...
One can bring out in Dworkin's work a hidden conception of a theory of law (or a metatheory), which ...
This document outlines the debate on the concept of Law in the work “Justice with a Toga”. Secondly,...
Lawyers are typically concerned with propositions of law. How are we to understand their meaning and...
International audienceSince Aristotle, reasonable disagreement exists if each opponent accepts the p...
International audienceSince Aristotle, reasonable disagreement exists if each opponent accepts the p...
Professor Dworkin criticises legal positivism, concentrating particularly on the version provided by...
peer reviewedAnalyse d'une pathologie de l'argumentation : doctrine et jurisprudence fondant sur la ...
This doctoral thesis analyzes various philosophical treatments of the phenomenon of legal disagreeme...
International audienceIntuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this pape...
Altera pars audiatur : Law in the Collision of Discourses. Against recent attempts to institutionali...
The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century,...
Bourcier Danièle. Argumentation et définition en droit. In: Langages, 10ᵉ année, n°42, 1976. Argumen...
International audienceIntuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this pape...
International audienceLaw as integrity as a dworkinian theory is mainly a theory of legal argumentat...
Dworkin's theory is basically an expression of the rule of law doctrine, since it holds that the exi...
One can bring out in Dworkin's work a hidden conception of a theory of law (or a metatheory), which ...
This document outlines the debate on the concept of Law in the work “Justice with a Toga”. Secondly,...
Lawyers are typically concerned with propositions of law. How are we to understand their meaning and...
International audienceSince Aristotle, reasonable disagreement exists if each opponent accepts the p...
International audienceSince Aristotle, reasonable disagreement exists if each opponent accepts the p...
Professor Dworkin criticises legal positivism, concentrating particularly on the version provided by...
peer reviewedAnalyse d'une pathologie de l'argumentation : doctrine et jurisprudence fondant sur la ...
This doctoral thesis analyzes various philosophical treatments of the phenomenon of legal disagreeme...
International audienceIntuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this pape...
Altera pars audiatur : Law in the Collision of Discourses. Against recent attempts to institutionali...
The paper aims to present the legal theories of legal argumentation constructed in the last century,...
Bourcier Danièle. Argumentation et définition en droit. In: Langages, 10ᵉ année, n°42, 1976. Argumen...
International audienceIntuitively, the disagreement is related to subjectivity. The aim of this pape...