International audienceThis paper develops a theory of the centralization of firms engaged in multi-market collusive agreements. A centralized organization (called the unitary or U-form) allows price coordination across several markets, whereas with decentralized (the multidivisional or M-form) firms the probability that the antitrust authority will find evidence of collusion on one market while investigating the other is lower. We show that the firm’s choice of internal structure depends to a large extent on product substitutability and the instruments used by the antitrust authority
In this paper, we develop a model of collusion in which two firms play an infinitely-repeated Bertra...
Preliminary version We study the impact of internal decision-making structures on the stability of c...
A "collusion puzzle" exists by which, even though increasing the number of firms reduces the ability...
International audienceThis paper develops a theory of the centralization of firms engaged in multi-m...
This paper develops a theory concerning the centralization degree of firms involving in multimarket ...
Abstract: This paper develops a theory concerning the centralization degree of firms involving in mu...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority affects market-sharing agreements made...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority affects market-sharing agreements mad...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority on market sharing agreements a¤ects th...
Centralization of pricing decisions and collusion. This paper compares the feasibility of tacit co...
This paper examines collusion among firms whose discount factors are private information. Mutual unc...
This article studies how the presence of an antitrust authority a¤ects market-sharing agreements mad...
This paper examines an infinitely-repeated Bertrand game in which each firm (principal) internally o...
A “collusion puzzle” exists by which, even though increasing the number of firms reduces the ability...
In antitrust analysis it is generally agreed that a small number of firms operating in the industry ...
In this paper, we develop a model of collusion in which two firms play an infinitely-repeated Bertra...
Preliminary version We study the impact of internal decision-making structures on the stability of c...
A "collusion puzzle" exists by which, even though increasing the number of firms reduces the ability...
International audienceThis paper develops a theory of the centralization of firms engaged in multi-m...
This paper develops a theory concerning the centralization degree of firms involving in multimarket ...
Abstract: This paper develops a theory concerning the centralization degree of firms involving in mu...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority affects market-sharing agreements made...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority affects market-sharing agreements mad...
This paper studies how the presence of an antitrust authority on market sharing agreements a¤ects th...
Centralization of pricing decisions and collusion. This paper compares the feasibility of tacit co...
This paper examines collusion among firms whose discount factors are private information. Mutual unc...
This article studies how the presence of an antitrust authority a¤ects market-sharing agreements mad...
This paper examines an infinitely-repeated Bertrand game in which each firm (principal) internally o...
A “collusion puzzle” exists by which, even though increasing the number of firms reduces the ability...
In antitrust analysis it is generally agreed that a small number of firms operating in the industry ...
In this paper, we develop a model of collusion in which two firms play an infinitely-repeated Bertra...
Preliminary version We study the impact of internal decision-making structures on the stability of c...
A "collusion puzzle" exists by which, even though increasing the number of firms reduces the ability...