Quitting Certainties is an extremely ambitious treatise on Bayesian formal epistemology. The centrepiece is a modelling framework that can be applied to non-ideal epistemic agents as well as to ideal agents. Unlike many trad-itional approaches to Bayesian epistemology, the framework allows for agents to go from certainty to less-than-certainty in a claim; Titelbaum accordingly calls it the ‘certainty-loss framework ’ (CLF). It is designed to model agents’ degrees of belief in context-sensitive claims (such as the claim that it is now Monday), to allow for the forgetting of factual information (such as informa-tion about what was had for breakfast several years ago), and to allow for ignorance of logical truths (such as complicated mathemati...
The Capgras delusion is a condition in which a person believes that an imposter has replaced some cl...
Moss (2013) argues that degrees of belief or credences can amount to knowledge in much the way that ...
I argue that when we use ‘probability’ language in epistemic contexts—e.g., when we ask how probable...
Quitting Certainties is an extremely ambitious treatise on Bayesian formal epistemology. The centrep...
Bayesian Epistemology is a general framework for thinking about agents who have beliefs that come in...
Bayesian modeling techniques have proven remarkably successful at representing rational constraints ...
English abstract: This paper discusses the delicate relationship between traditional epistemology an...
honors thesisCollege of HumanitiesPhilosophyJonah N. SchuphachIn this paper I push for and defend th...
One very popular framework in contemporary epistemology is Bayesian. The central epistemic state is ...
“Damned by Faint Praise” is the phenomenon whereby weak positive information leads to a negative cha...
Foundations of Bayesianism is an authoritative collection of papers addressing the key challenges th...
One of the fundamental problems of epistemology is to say when the evidence in an agent’s possession...
Three prominent views in the epistemology of disagreement: I Equal weight view: I should assign as m...
Foundations of Bayesianism is an authoritative collection of papers addressing the key challenges th...
We propose a framework for general Bayesian inference. We argue that a valid update of a prior belie...
The Capgras delusion is a condition in which a person believes that an imposter has replaced some cl...
Moss (2013) argues that degrees of belief or credences can amount to knowledge in much the way that ...
I argue that when we use ‘probability’ language in epistemic contexts—e.g., when we ask how probable...
Quitting Certainties is an extremely ambitious treatise on Bayesian formal epistemology. The centrep...
Bayesian Epistemology is a general framework for thinking about agents who have beliefs that come in...
Bayesian modeling techniques have proven remarkably successful at representing rational constraints ...
English abstract: This paper discusses the delicate relationship between traditional epistemology an...
honors thesisCollege of HumanitiesPhilosophyJonah N. SchuphachIn this paper I push for and defend th...
One very popular framework in contemporary epistemology is Bayesian. The central epistemic state is ...
“Damned by Faint Praise” is the phenomenon whereby weak positive information leads to a negative cha...
Foundations of Bayesianism is an authoritative collection of papers addressing the key challenges th...
One of the fundamental problems of epistemology is to say when the evidence in an agent’s possession...
Three prominent views in the epistemology of disagreement: I Equal weight view: I should assign as m...
Foundations of Bayesianism is an authoritative collection of papers addressing the key challenges th...
We propose a framework for general Bayesian inference. We argue that a valid update of a prior belie...
The Capgras delusion is a condition in which a person believes that an imposter has replaced some cl...
Moss (2013) argues that degrees of belief or credences can amount to knowledge in much the way that ...
I argue that when we use ‘probability’ language in epistemic contexts—e.g., when we ask how probable...