Add to ORKGIn this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which two or more arguments are involved. In formal systems of defeasible argumentation, arguments for and against a proposition are produced and evaluated to verify the acceptability of that proposition
In the theory of abstract argumentation, the acceptance status of arguments is normally determined f...
AbstractIn this paper, we extend the theory of abstract argumentation systems proposed by Vreeswijk ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which t...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments for propositions-structured ...
Séminaire MIAT INRAAbstract argumentation is an elegant way to tackle reasoning problems in presence...
Selected papers of 9th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertai...
. Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a formal framework for assessing conflicting argu...
Abstract. Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some componen...
This paper investigates the relation between logics for defeasible conditionals and systems for defe...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
. In this paper a dialectical proof theory is proposed for logical systems for defeasible argumentat...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components re-main...
In the theory of abstract argumentation, the acceptance status of arguments is normally determined f...
AbstractIn this paper, we extend the theory of abstract argumentation systems proposed by Vreeswijk ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...
In this work we explore the inclusion of the notion of multiple argument conflicts, those in which t...
The area of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning has been enriched during the past two decades wit...
Argument systems are based on the idea that one can construct arguments for propositions-structured ...
Séminaire MIAT INRAAbstract argumentation is an elegant way to tackle reasoning problems in presence...
Selected papers of 9th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertai...
. Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a formal framework for assessing conflicting argu...
Abstract. Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some componen...
This paper investigates the relation between logics for defeasible conditionals and systems for defe...
Abstract. Defeat between arguments is established by a combination of two basic elements: a conflict...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components remain ...
. In this paper a dialectical proof theory is proposed for logical systems for defeasible argumentat...
Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for defeasible reasoning where some components re-main...
In the theory of abstract argumentation, the acceptance status of arguments is normally determined f...
AbstractIn this paper, we extend the theory of abstract argumentation systems proposed by Vreeswijk ...
This chapter discusses how formal models of argumentation can clarify philosophical problems and iss...