Is it a prosecutor’s world? Determinants of count bargaining decisions

Prosecutors have virtually unfettered discretion in their plea negotiations with defen-dants. Where discretion is unrestricted, unwarranted disparity is likely to follow. The current study examines the relationship between offender characteristics and count bar-gaining. From an integrated theory approach (integrating concession and consensus models, liberation hypothesis, and focal concerns theory), the current study hypothesizes that race and ethnicity, sex, age, and employment status of the offender has an effect on count bargaining decisions in only the borderline serious cases. Data were collected on 2,578 guilty pleas in Chicago, Illinois, in 1993 and analyzed using a backwards selec-tion logistic regression analysis partitioning cases by severity of the most serious charge. The results from these analyses indicate that offender characteristics do not have a sta-tistically significant effect on count bargaining. However, there may be important dif-ferences masked by straight pleas, symbolic bargaining, and overcharging practices