Extraction out of free relative clauses (FRs) is not expected to be possible as adjuncts are typically islands for movement. Such movement violates Subjacency and the ECP. However, Engdahl (1997):56 noted that Norwegian seems to allow the extraction of the subject of a free relative in some instances. She gave the example shown in (1). (1) Denne kunstnereni kjøper jeg hva enn ti produserer1 this artist buy I what ever produces ‘I buy whatever this artist produces’ An illustration of this extraction (assuming the headless analysis of free relatives) is given in (2)
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the M...
Adjunct islands (i.e., extraction from adjoined clauses) are considered to be islands for movement a...
In this paper we will deal with some aspects of free relative clauses (FRC) in English, showing that...
This article examines an anomalous construction in Norwegian that appears to be leftward extraction...
This brief article investigates the restrictions on Mainland Scandinavian relative clause extraction...
Adjuncts and relative clauses are traditionally classified as strong islands for extraction across l...
In the first two decades following Ross’s Constraints on Variables in Syntax, a picture emerged in w...
Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2011. Editors: Bol...
Free relatives, also known as headless relatives, get their name from the fact that they do not appe...
The article argues for the Comp account (e.g., Groos and Van Riems-dijk 1981) over the head account ...
Recent research suggests that island effects may vary as a function of dependency type, potentially ...
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the M...
We present a series of large-scale formal acceptability judgment studies that explored Norwegian isl...
Relative clauses are considered strong islands for extraction across languages. Swedish comprises a ...
This dissertation is a study of the syntax and interpretation of free relatives. Different types of ...
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the M...
Adjunct islands (i.e., extraction from adjoined clauses) are considered to be islands for movement a...
In this paper we will deal with some aspects of free relative clauses (FRC) in English, showing that...
This article examines an anomalous construction in Norwegian that appears to be leftward extraction...
This brief article investigates the restrictions on Mainland Scandinavian relative clause extraction...
Adjuncts and relative clauses are traditionally classified as strong islands for extraction across l...
In the first two decades following Ross’s Constraints on Variables in Syntax, a picture emerged in w...
Proceedings of the 18th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics NODALIDA 2011. Editors: Bol...
Free relatives, also known as headless relatives, get their name from the fact that they do not appe...
The article argues for the Comp account (e.g., Groos and Van Riems-dijk 1981) over the head account ...
Recent research suggests that island effects may vary as a function of dependency type, potentially ...
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the M...
We present a series of large-scale formal acceptability judgment studies that explored Norwegian isl...
Relative clauses are considered strong islands for extraction across languages. Swedish comprises a ...
This dissertation is a study of the syntax and interpretation of free relatives. Different types of ...
Extraction from relative clauses is generally taken to be unacceptable in Icelandic, unlike in the M...
Adjunct islands (i.e., extraction from adjoined clauses) are considered to be islands for movement a...
In this paper we will deal with some aspects of free relative clauses (FRC) in English, showing that...