Background—Dabigatran, an oral thrombin inhibitor, and rivaroxaban and apixaban, oral factor Xa inhibitors, have been found to be safe and effective in reducing stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of the 3 new agents based on data from their published warfarin-controlled randomized trials, using the method of adjusted indirect comparisons. Methods and Results—We included findings from 44 535 patients enrolled in 3 trials of the efficacy of dabigatran (Randomize
Introduction: New oral anticoagulants are non-inferior compared with warfarin regarding stroke preve...
New oral anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoksaban) or thrombin (dabig...
No studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)...
This study sought to perform an indirect comparison analysis of dabigatran etexilate (2 doses), riva...
ObjectivesThis study sought to perform an indirect comparison analysis of dabigatran etexilate (2 do...
Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven non-inferior or superior to warfar...
Large Phase 3 clinical trials for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) have compared non-vi...
Objective: To do an indirect comparison analysis of apixaban against dabigatran etexilate (2 doses) ...
In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabig...
The aim of this study was to compare the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding...
BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in pat...
Alternative anticoagulants to warfarin (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) are becoming availabl...
Objective: To compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)...
ObjectiveTo compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) d...
AbstractBackgroundThis study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagul...
Introduction: New oral anticoagulants are non-inferior compared with warfarin regarding stroke preve...
New oral anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoksaban) or thrombin (dabig...
No studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)...
This study sought to perform an indirect comparison analysis of dabigatran etexilate (2 doses), riva...
ObjectivesThis study sought to perform an indirect comparison analysis of dabigatran etexilate (2 do...
Introduction: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been proven non-inferior or superior to warfar...
Large Phase 3 clinical trials for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) have compared non-vi...
Objective: To do an indirect comparison analysis of apixaban against dabigatran etexilate (2 doses) ...
In this overview we address the three phase III studies that compared new oral anticoagulants (dabig...
The aim of this study was to compare the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding...
BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over warfarin in pat...
Alternative anticoagulants to warfarin (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) are becoming availabl...
Objective: To compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)...
ObjectiveTo compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) d...
AbstractBackgroundThis study was designed to compare efficacy and safety among novel oral anticoagul...
Introduction: New oral anticoagulants are non-inferior compared with warfarin regarding stroke preve...
New oral anticoagulants that inhibit factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoksaban) or thrombin (dabig...
No studies have directly compared the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)...