RESPONSE PROBABILITY AND RESPONSE LATENCY mege OBTAINED * MEASURES OF DISCRIMINATION LATENCY WERE RELATED TO MEASURES OF RESPONSE pomemumiTy. IN THE CHOICE OF A MODE OF EXPRESSION FOR RESPONSE

Cross David V
Psychometrics Learning Immures
Ann Amor
Reinforcement For
The Epission
Of Either
Op Tuc
Putually Exclusive
Latency The
Most Camoioatis
Mere The
Riciprocal

Publication date

October 2016

Abstract

p mir c NM. U. S. DEPARTMENT OP HEAtiii, EDUCATION AND WELFARE office of Education 11 * doctinutit titi5, ' been raptOdUCod exactly at tectilVad front Me person or ottonitationi origin/Wm it. Points of view or opinions *taws do not nista-sway toptekint °Mew Wilco of Ediestiott position or policy.-8.111***11 /1.72 HE UNIVERSILY \ F \ MICHIGAN.4 '"tr.":"4,140:444t 0.4 4;'"4,17&quot

Extracted data

We use cookies to provide a better user experience.

Data Protection

RESPONSE PROBABILITY AND RESPONSE LATENCY mege OBTAINED * MEASURES OF DISCRIMINATION LATENCY WERE RELATED TO MEASURES OF RESPONSE pomemumiTy. IN THE CHOICE OF A MODE OF EXPRESSION FOR RESPONSE

Abstract

Extracted data

RESPONSE PROBABILITY AND RESPONSE LATENCY mege OBTAINED * MEASURES OF DISCRIMINATION LATENCY WERE RELATED TO MEASURES OF RESPONSE pomemumiTy. IN THE CHOICE OF A MODE OF EXPRESSION FOR RESPONSE

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items