Risk attitudes of farmers are of major importance to agricultural economists. This study utilizes a questionnaire designed to determine risk aversion levels. Risk aversion intervals are elicited using generalized stochastic dominance for thirty northeastern Kansas farmers in order to investigate the relationship between age and level of risk aversion, the consistency of risk aversionover five income ranges, and the accuracyof farmers self-assessments of risk aversion. Results indicate no statistically significant difference between the risk aversion levels of younger and older farmers. The majority of farmers expressed fairly consistent risk altitudesover different income ranges. Finally, farmers show some ability to assess their own risk a...
We designed a field experiment involving real payments to elicit farmers’ risk preferences. Farmers ...
Analysis of farmer risk perceptions is usually limited to production risks, with risk perception as ...
Attitudes toward risk were measured in 240 households using two methods: an interview method eliciti...
A procedure for the measurement of risk attitudes is developed and applied. The data for the analysi...
Graduation date: 1986Two direct elicitation of utility (D.E.U.) techniques\ud were used to estimate ...
In applied agricultural economic research various risk-attitude elicitation techniques are used. Her...
This paper examines farmers' risk attitudes, obtained by responses to sources of risk, using an atti...
In applied agricultural economic research various risk-attitude elicitation techniques are used. Her...
Graduation date: 1980The present increasing need for the development of empirical hypotheses that ex...
In this article the interval approach to measuring risk attitudes is discussed. The concept of gener...
This study adapts a methodology formulated in the social sciences to develop a scale for measuring a...
Risk attitudes of farmers are very important to the decision-making under risk of farmers. There are...
This study estimates farmers' risk attitudes in Missouri using a non-structural approach over time. ...
Understanding the attitudes of farmers toward risk is important in understanding their decision maki...
Analysis of farmer risk perceptions is usually limited to production risks, with risk perception as ...
We designed a field experiment involving real payments to elicit farmers’ risk preferences. Farmers ...
Analysis of farmer risk perceptions is usually limited to production risks, with risk perception as ...
Attitudes toward risk were measured in 240 households using two methods: an interview method eliciti...
A procedure for the measurement of risk attitudes is developed and applied. The data for the analysi...
Graduation date: 1986Two direct elicitation of utility (D.E.U.) techniques\ud were used to estimate ...
In applied agricultural economic research various risk-attitude elicitation techniques are used. Her...
This paper examines farmers' risk attitudes, obtained by responses to sources of risk, using an atti...
In applied agricultural economic research various risk-attitude elicitation techniques are used. Her...
Graduation date: 1980The present increasing need for the development of empirical hypotheses that ex...
In this article the interval approach to measuring risk attitudes is discussed. The concept of gener...
This study adapts a methodology formulated in the social sciences to develop a scale for measuring a...
Risk attitudes of farmers are very important to the decision-making under risk of farmers. There are...
This study estimates farmers' risk attitudes in Missouri using a non-structural approach over time. ...
Understanding the attitudes of farmers toward risk is important in understanding their decision maki...
Analysis of farmer risk perceptions is usually limited to production risks, with risk perception as ...
We designed a field experiment involving real payments to elicit farmers’ risk preferences. Farmers ...
Analysis of farmer risk perceptions is usually limited to production risks, with risk perception as ...
Attitudes toward risk were measured in 240 households using two methods: an interview method eliciti...