A prospective randomized phase III study in non-small-cell lung cancer comparing cisplatin, ifosfamide, vinblastine (VIP) versus cisplatin, ifosfamide and etoposide (VIP-16)
PubMed ID: 16924573Cisplatin-etoposide (CE) and mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) combinatio...
Phase II study of vinorelbine and gemcitabine for inoperable stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cance
To evaluate the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced...
Quality versus quantity of life in the treatment of patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer? A...
A randomized trial of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) versus carboplatin, etoposide and ble...
phase III trial comparing cisplatin–etoposide to carboplatin–paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic no...
Twenty-seven previously untreated patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer were treated...
Gemcitabine–docetaxel versus cisplatin–vinorelbine in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung can...
PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC...
The phase III PROCLAIM study evaluated overall survival (OS) of concurrent pemetrexed-cisplatin and ...
Phase II study of a closely spaced ifosfamide—cisplatin schedule with the addition of G-CSF in advan...
Six hundred eighty assessable patients with measur-able stage III M1 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSC...
NOTE: THE SYMBOLS/SPECIAL CHARACTERS IN THIS ABSTRACT CANNOT BE DISPLAYED CORRECTLY ON THIS PAGE. PL...
Purpose: Three previous mitomycin-cisplatin-based chemo-therapy trials conducted within the EORTC Gy...
Background: We conducted a phase I—II trial to assess the feasibility and activity of a combination ...
PubMed ID: 16924573Cisplatin-etoposide (CE) and mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) combinatio...
Phase II study of vinorelbine and gemcitabine for inoperable stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cance
To evaluate the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced...
Quality versus quantity of life in the treatment of patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer? A...
A randomized trial of cisplatin, etoposide and bleomycin (PEB) versus carboplatin, etoposide and ble...
phase III trial comparing cisplatin–etoposide to carboplatin–paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic no...
Twenty-seven previously untreated patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer were treated...
Gemcitabine–docetaxel versus cisplatin–vinorelbine in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung can...
PURPOSE: To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with mitomycin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (MIC...
The phase III PROCLAIM study evaluated overall survival (OS) of concurrent pemetrexed-cisplatin and ...
Phase II study of a closely spaced ifosfamide—cisplatin schedule with the addition of G-CSF in advan...
Six hundred eighty assessable patients with measur-able stage III M1 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSC...
NOTE: THE SYMBOLS/SPECIAL CHARACTERS IN THIS ABSTRACT CANNOT BE DISPLAYED CORRECTLY ON THIS PAGE. PL...
Purpose: Three previous mitomycin-cisplatin-based chemo-therapy trials conducted within the EORTC Gy...
Background: We conducted a phase I—II trial to assess the feasibility and activity of a combination ...
PubMed ID: 16924573Cisplatin-etoposide (CE) and mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC) combinatio...
Phase II study of vinorelbine and gemcitabine for inoperable stage IIIB-IV non-small-cell lung cance
To evaluate the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (VIP) in patients with advanced...