Add to ORKGConsiders the extent to which the UK doctrine of separation of powers exerts a normative influence on judicial decision-making. Examines the evolving constitutional significance of the doctrine, and how it manifests itself in judicial discourse through variants that are hierarchical, weakly normative, strongly normative and constitutionally fundamental. Outlines the context-specific nature of the variants
There have been several important formal changes to the United Kingdom’s constitution over the past ...
What does the future hold for the US and UK Supreme Courts? Both courts face an uncertain future in ...
In this article, I consider judicial disapproval as a form of non-binding review of the constitution...
In its celebrated prorogation judgment, the Supreme Court made novel and controversial use of the pr...
Reflects on the constitutional implications of ouster clauses, especially regarding separation of po...
The role of the UK Supreme Court as conventionally understood is to give effect to, and not to chall...
Over the last few decades, the UK has experienced a profound – if quiet – constitutional transformat...
Roger Masterman examines the dividing lines between the powers of the judicial branch of government ...
Examination of the state-centric dynamics of constitutions can only partially illuminate the multi-f...
MARK Bevir is right to highlight a number of similar concerns that underpin our respective views; eq...
In this article the relationship between Parliament and courts is examined. The views of writers on ...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
The aim of this paper is to explore the role of judicial review of legislation in the UK from a lega...
Writing about separation of powers with particular attention to the contrasting American and British...
This Article initially will compare the United States Constitution and the British constitution both...
There have been several important formal changes to the United Kingdom’s constitution over the past ...
What does the future hold for the US and UK Supreme Courts? Both courts face an uncertain future in ...
In this article, I consider judicial disapproval as a form of non-binding review of the constitution...
In its celebrated prorogation judgment, the Supreme Court made novel and controversial use of the pr...
Reflects on the constitutional implications of ouster clauses, especially regarding separation of po...
The role of the UK Supreme Court as conventionally understood is to give effect to, and not to chall...
Over the last few decades, the UK has experienced a profound – if quiet – constitutional transformat...
Roger Masterman examines the dividing lines between the powers of the judicial branch of government ...
Examination of the state-centric dynamics of constitutions can only partially illuminate the multi-f...
MARK Bevir is right to highlight a number of similar concerns that underpin our respective views; eq...
In this article the relationship between Parliament and courts is examined. The views of writers on ...
An unprecedented eleven-member UK Supreme Court decided R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting ...
The aim of this paper is to explore the role of judicial review of legislation in the UK from a lega...
Writing about separation of powers with particular attention to the contrasting American and British...
This Article initially will compare the United States Constitution and the British constitution both...
There have been several important formal changes to the United Kingdom’s constitution over the past ...
What does the future hold for the US and UK Supreme Courts? Both courts face an uncertain future in ...
In this article, I consider judicial disapproval as a form of non-binding review of the constitution...