The history of Dutch literature between 1880 and 1940 has traditionally been described as a series of literary movements or generations in quick succession. Each generation is associated with a new, innovative literary programme that challenges and eventually replaces older aesthetic principles, only to be replaced itself by a still newer aesthetic paradigm some five, ten or twenty years later. In several articles, Dorleijn and Van den Akker (2003, 2006) have questioned the validity of this model with reference to Dutch literature. They think it improbable that a mere fifty-year period would have seen so many radical turnovers of literary values. As an alternative to a model based on discontinuity, they propose one that takes into account t...