This paper reports the results of a web-based perception study of the ranking of peer reviewed accounting journals by UK academics. The design of the survey instrument allows an interactive selection of journals to be scored. The web-based format is unique in that it also includes a step in which respondents classify the journals according to methodological perspective (paradigm). This is depicted graphically in the paper in a bubble diagram that shows the “positioning” of journals according to perceptions of both paradigm and quality
Purpose - The aim of this paper is to benchmark the quality of web sites of major public accounting ...
Much research has been published related to journal quality in fields such as accounting, finance, i...
Purpose– This editorial aims to consider contemporary issues for accounting scholars, in particular ...
This paper reports the result of a web-based perception study of the ranking of widely-held accounti...
This paper reports the construction of an ‘efficient frontier’ of the perceived quality attributes o...
This paper reports the construction of an ‘efficient frontier’ of the perceived quality ...
This paper uses evidence gathered in two perception studies of Australasian and British accounting a...
While the purpose of academic research is to obtain new knowledge and understanding, there is an inc...
Journal ranking studies have generally adopted citation techniques or academic perceptions as the ba...
The practice of evaluating faculty and business schools based on their journal publications has incr...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reflect upon the focus and changing nature of measuring acad...
Given the many and varied uses to which journal rankings are put, interest in ranking journal 'quali...
Given the many and varied uses to which journal rankings are put, interest in ranking journal 'quali...
We explore the drivers of researchers’ perceptions around journal quality, and how these per- ceptio...
This paper reports the results of a survey of Australian accounting and finance academics at the lev...
Purpose - The aim of this paper is to benchmark the quality of web sites of major public accounting ...
Much research has been published related to journal quality in fields such as accounting, finance, i...
Purpose– This editorial aims to consider contemporary issues for accounting scholars, in particular ...
This paper reports the result of a web-based perception study of the ranking of widely-held accounti...
This paper reports the construction of an ‘efficient frontier’ of the perceived quality attributes o...
This paper reports the construction of an ‘efficient frontier’ of the perceived quality ...
This paper uses evidence gathered in two perception studies of Australasian and British accounting a...
While the purpose of academic research is to obtain new knowledge and understanding, there is an inc...
Journal ranking studies have generally adopted citation techniques or academic perceptions as the ba...
The practice of evaluating faculty and business schools based on their journal publications has incr...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to reflect upon the focus and changing nature of measuring acad...
Given the many and varied uses to which journal rankings are put, interest in ranking journal 'quali...
Given the many and varied uses to which journal rankings are put, interest in ranking journal 'quali...
We explore the drivers of researchers’ perceptions around journal quality, and how these per- ceptio...
This paper reports the results of a survey of Australian accounting and finance academics at the lev...
Purpose - The aim of this paper is to benchmark the quality of web sites of major public accounting ...
Much research has been published related to journal quality in fields such as accounting, finance, i...
Purpose– This editorial aims to consider contemporary issues for accounting scholars, in particular ...