Commentary on Jones & Love: Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? Published online: 25 August 2011We agree with Jones & Love (J&L) that much of Bayesian modeling has taken a fundamentalist approach to cognition; but we do not believe in the potential of Bayesianism to provide insights into psychological processes. We discuss the advantages of associative explanations over Bayesian approaches to causal induction, and argue that Bayesian models have added little to our understanding of human causal reasoning.Irina Baetu, Itxaso Barberia, Robin A. Murphy, and A. G. Bake
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about what assumptions underpin...
We confess that the first part of our title is somewhat of a misnomer. Bayesian reasoning is a norma...
The real purpose of collecting big data is to identify causality in the hope that this will facilita...
Abstract: The prominence of Bayesian modeling of cognition has increased recently largely because of...
In advocating Bayesian Enlightenment as a solution to Bayesian Fundamentalism, Jones and Love rule o...
Bowers and Davis (2012) criticize Bayesian modelers for telling "just so" stories about cognition an...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
A series of high-profile critiques of Bayesian models of cognition have recently sparked controversy...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
Jones & Love (J&L) suggest that Bayesian approaches to the explanation of human behavior should be c...
Bayesian models of human learning are becoming increasingly popular in cognitive science. We argue t...
Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abst...
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about the assumptions that unde...
In his 2003 book Hume Variations, Jerry Fodor argues the Computational Theory of Mind (CTM) has obvi...
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about what assumptions underpin...
We confess that the first part of our title is somewhat of a misnomer. Bayesian reasoning is a norma...
The real purpose of collecting big data is to identify causality in the hope that this will facilita...
Abstract: The prominence of Bayesian modeling of cognition has increased recently largely because of...
In advocating Bayesian Enlightenment as a solution to Bayesian Fundamentalism, Jones and Love rule o...
Bowers and Davis (2012) criticize Bayesian modelers for telling "just so" stories about cognition an...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
A series of high-profile critiques of Bayesian models of cognition have recently sparked controversy...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corre...
Jones & Love (J&L) suggest that Bayesian approaches to the explanation of human behavior should be c...
Bayesian models of human learning are becoming increasingly popular in cognitive science. We argue t...
Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abst...
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about the assumptions that unde...
In his 2003 book Hume Variations, Jerry Fodor argues the Computational Theory of Mind (CTM) has obvi...
Recent debates in the psychological literature have raised questions about what assumptions underpin...
We confess that the first part of our title is somewhat of a misnomer. Bayesian reasoning is a norma...
The real purpose of collecting big data is to identify causality in the hope that this will facilita...