Limnological data and depth profile from Oneida Lake, New York, 1975 to present

This data package must be uncompressed for use. In addition to the data described above, it includes an Ecological Metadata Language (EML) record, which describes in considerable detail the contents of the data table(s), methods, usage rights, and other information. All users of these data are strongly encouraged to review this EML record. This data set is made available under the Open Data Commons Attribution License: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/. Users of this data set are very strongly encouraged to check with the data set Owner or the individual listed as the Contact for this data set to verify that they have the most current and correct version of the data. Users should notify the data set Owner/Contact to describe their intended use of the data set, including planned publications, and are encouraged to supply the Owner/Contact with a copy of any publication or derivative work using or citing the data set.This dataset contains limnological data from Oneida Lake and is part of the collection "Cornell Oneida Lake Data". The Cornell Biological Field Station (CBFS) serves as a primary field site for aquatic research at Cornell University (more information can be found at http://cbfs.dnr.cornell.edu) and is part of the Department of Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University. The centerpiece of the station's research program is a 60-year database on the food web of Oneida Lake, New York, that has been collected with support from the Cornell University Brown Endowment and from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The data are collected by personnel from the Cornell Biological Field Station and include limnology, benthos, zooplankton, phytoplankton, and fish datasets from Oneida Lake from 1957 to the present. This data package includes four tables: (1) location and attributes of sampling stations, (2) Depth profiles for temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, conductivity and from 2011 chlorophyll, (3) average water column data for each station sampled, and (4) average weekly water column data