The views expressed in the commentaries challenge many of the tenets of the planning-control model as espoused in the target article. This response is aimed at addressing the most serious of these challenges as well as clarifying errors of interpretation. It is argued that the majority of the challenges from brain and behavior, although meritorious, can nonetheless be incorporated within the planning-control model. It is concluded that only some minor revision of the model with regard to anatomy is necessary at this time
International audienceIn this paper, we argue that no valid comparison between visual representation...
The invited commentaries to Hobbis and Sutton (this issue) show that we achieved our aim of stimulat...
On the basis of research in self-paced aiming movements, Glover [S. Glover, Separate visual represen...
The views expressed in the commentaries challenge many of the tenets of the planning-control model a...
Evidence for a dichotomy between the planning of an action and its on-line control in humans is revi...
We argue that planning and control may not be separable entities, either at the behavioural level or...
We argue that planning and control may Dot be separable entities, either at the behavioural level or...
The planning/control distinction is an important tool in the study of sensorimotor transformations. ...
Previous research on dual-tasks has shown that, under some circumstances, actions impair the percept...
Abstract Human vision allows us both to perceive our surroundings (e.g., identify a cup) and to inte...
Abstract: Glover argues that separate representations underlie the planning and the control phase of...
Our commentary focuses, first, on Glover's proposal that only motor planning is sensitive to cogniti...
The chapter's aim is to understand the role of visual information in the control of avoidance and in...
Constraints pertaining to interlimb coordination have been studied extensively in the past decades. ...
The Brain is a slow computer yet humans can skilfully play games where very fast reactions are requi...
International audienceIn this paper, we argue that no valid comparison between visual representation...
The invited commentaries to Hobbis and Sutton (this issue) show that we achieved our aim of stimulat...
On the basis of research in self-paced aiming movements, Glover [S. Glover, Separate visual represen...
The views expressed in the commentaries challenge many of the tenets of the planning-control model a...
Evidence for a dichotomy between the planning of an action and its on-line control in humans is revi...
We argue that planning and control may not be separable entities, either at the behavioural level or...
We argue that planning and control may Dot be separable entities, either at the behavioural level or...
The planning/control distinction is an important tool in the study of sensorimotor transformations. ...
Previous research on dual-tasks has shown that, under some circumstances, actions impair the percept...
Abstract Human vision allows us both to perceive our surroundings (e.g., identify a cup) and to inte...
Abstract: Glover argues that separate representations underlie the planning and the control phase of...
Our commentary focuses, first, on Glover's proposal that only motor planning is sensitive to cogniti...
The chapter's aim is to understand the role of visual information in the control of avoidance and in...
Constraints pertaining to interlimb coordination have been studied extensively in the past decades. ...
The Brain is a slow computer yet humans can skilfully play games where very fast reactions are requi...
International audienceIn this paper, we argue that no valid comparison between visual representation...
The invited commentaries to Hobbis and Sutton (this issue) show that we achieved our aim of stimulat...
On the basis of research in self-paced aiming movements, Glover [S. Glover, Separate visual represen...