Add to ORKGA systematic review is one of the most important contributions to clinical decision-making for evidence-based practice (EBP). Studies focused on aphasia group treatment, published since 1981, were entered into a six-step systematic review (Dollaghan et al, 2007), to evaluate the overall quality and weight of the evidence. This review suggests that there are short-term impairment-level benefits of group aphasia treatments but that there is insufficient evidence to make conclusions about long-term outcomes or outcomes related to activities and life participation. Implications for practice and future research are discussed
The viability of group treatment in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) is at a crossroads. W...
Background Improved discourse production is a priority for all key stakeholders in aphasia rehabili...
Introduction Aphasia significantly impacts on the individual, families and communities. Timely, effe...
Background: Recent reviews conclude that aphasia intervention is effective. However, replication and...
Background: Recent reviews conclude that aphasia intervention is effective. However, replication and...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston UniversityCurrently, two treatment orientations exist in remediation of aphas...
Clinical Question: For people with aphasia following a stroke, is group therapy shown to be more eff...
Traditionally, much of individual aphasia therapy has been focused on attempts to remediate underlyi...
This is the first study since 1985 to explore the components of group aphasia therapies as identifie...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We now know that speech and language therapy (SALT) is effective in the rehabilit...
This presentation describes the procedures and results of a systematic review of the literature on c...
This presentation demonstrates an application of Living with Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurem...
The importance of evidence-based clinical practice has led to an effort by ASHA to develop a series ...
Background: People with language problems following stroke (aphasia) benefit from speech and languag...
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to review treatment studies of semantic feature analysis (SF...
The viability of group treatment in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) is at a crossroads. W...
Background Improved discourse production is a priority for all key stakeholders in aphasia rehabili...
Introduction Aphasia significantly impacts on the individual, families and communities. Timely, effe...
Background: Recent reviews conclude that aphasia intervention is effective. However, replication and...
Background: Recent reviews conclude that aphasia intervention is effective. However, replication and...
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston UniversityCurrently, two treatment orientations exist in remediation of aphas...
Clinical Question: For people with aphasia following a stroke, is group therapy shown to be more eff...
Traditionally, much of individual aphasia therapy has been focused on attempts to remediate underlyi...
This is the first study since 1985 to explore the components of group aphasia therapies as identifie...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We now know that speech and language therapy (SALT) is effective in the rehabilit...
This presentation describes the procedures and results of a systematic review of the literature on c...
This presentation demonstrates an application of Living with Aphasia: Framework for Outcome Measurem...
The importance of evidence-based clinical practice has led to an effort by ASHA to develop a series ...
Background: People with language problems following stroke (aphasia) benefit from speech and languag...
Purpose : The purpose of this study was to review treatment studies of semantic feature analysis (SF...
The viability of group treatment in inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) is at a crossroads. W...
Background Improved discourse production is a priority for all key stakeholders in aphasia rehabili...
Introduction Aphasia significantly impacts on the individual, families and communities. Timely, effe...