Empirical Study on Damages in Patent Infringement Cases

[[abstract]]知識產業的興起，為各國帶來巨大利益，但若要確實掌握這股潮流，智慧財產權制度必須要健全，尤其是專利權，已從消極的保護功能演進為積極之獲利工具。越來越多的商業模式跳脫實體商品之研發、製造與銷售，而直接以專利權之管理運用作為向第三人獲取巨額權利金或賠償金之工具；如此之作法是否超越立法者針對專利權之本質認定有待商確，但可確信的是專利侵權損害賠償已為企業界不得不修習之課題。 此一議題越來越受到重視，因此本文主要整理目前台灣對於專利損害賠償計算方法後，並參考美國目前專利損害賠償後，直接切入我國目前司法實務對於專利損害賠償之看法以及整理自我國智財法院成立起至目前所有判決，並針對法院有判賠之案件進行量化分析，以便瞭解我國之專利侵權損害賠償方法之理論及實務運作情形。 最後對於我國專利侵權損害賠償方法提出修法或適用建議。[[abstract]]The issue has been valued gradually therefore the article mainly sorts out the calculation of patent compensatory damages refers to patent compensatory damages in the United States shows the opinion of patent compensatory damages by current judicial practice and all the judgements that Intellectual Property Court in R O C has made then quantifies and analyses the cases that Intellectual Property Court has cast in for damages in order to understand the theory of the calculation of patent compensatory damages and the situation that judicial practice works in R O C Last the article proposes the suggestion of amendment and application of legislature in patent compensatory damages in R O