The Research of Drunk Driving Law's Effectiveness of the Implementation

[[abstract]]由於酒駕肇事新聞頻傳，常造成致人死傷的慘劇，在媒體的推波助瀾，已引起社會輿論的高度重視。在民意的沸騰下，政府為遏止酒駕歪風，也屢次順應民意不斷地修法將酒駕的行政罰與刑事罰提高，致使公共危險犯的人數激增，不僅造成嚴重的社會問題，也浪費了司法資源及使監所戒護人力上的吃緊。 然在嚴刑峻罰的政策下，仍無法有效杜絕民眾酒後駕車的陋習，酒後駕車事件依舊層出不窮，由此可見，如何透過有效的預防、控制機制，破除民眾僥倖的心態，從心理、環境及社會情境與配套的政策立法，根本的解決此一亂象，實是課不容緩的議題。 又立法者強力推動嚴厲的酒後駕車處罰政策，分別於88年4月21日制訂刑法第185條之3「不能安全駕駛」之公共危險罪，次於100年11月30日增訂刑法「酒駕致死致重傷之加重結果犯」，復於102年6月11日將原刑法第185條之3「不能安全駕駛」之公共危險罪的呼氣酒精值由0 55mg/L降為0 25mg/L，同日亦將違反「道路交通處罰條例」處罰酒駕行為之行政罰的呼氣酒精值由0 25mg/L降為0 15mg/L，已成為全世界處罰酒駕標準最嚴格的國家之一。執法人員面對此一刑度加碼的立法，在執行面上其裁量基準為何？酒駕案件是否因此有減少的跡象？ 耑此，如何透過基礎教育、社會宣導、政策立法及國人自律配合等措施，掃除民眾酒後駕車的習性，才是根本解決之道。[[abstract]]Due to drunk driving accident news avalanche often caused to people casualties of tragedy in media of helped has caused social opinion of height attention In boiling public opinion of the government to curb drunk driving unhealthy repeated public opinion and continue to amend the law to drink and drive administrative penalties and criminal penalties increase resulting in a surge in the number of public perilous not only caused serious social problems but also a waste of judicial resources and make prison guard ring tight on manpower Under the harsh punishment policies still unable to effectively reduce the bad habits of people drinking and driving drinking and driving incidents still abound it is clear that how an effective mechanism for the prevention control get rid of people get away with attitude psychological environmental and social context and supporting the legislation and policy the fundamental solution to this mess it is a class issue that cannot be sustained Legislators strong push tougher penalties for drunk driving policy namely the formulation of public danger of the crime of Criminal Law Article 185-3 "unsafe driving" on April 21 1999 behind the November 30 2011 to update the Criminal Code "drunk driving causing death serious injury aggravated consequential offense "complex on June 11 2013 the original value of Penal Code Article 185-3 breath alcohol" public danger of the crime can not drive safely "decreased from 0 55mg / L to 0 25mg / L the same day will also be in violation of "the road traffic regulations on administrative penalties" punishment breath alcohol value administrative punishment for drunk driving behavior of the 0 25mg / L reduced to 0 15mg / L has become one of the world's most stringent penalties for drunk driving standard countries Law enforcement officers face a runaway this legislation what benchmarks are its discretion? Whether drunk driving case has reduced the signs? End this through basic education social advocacy policy and legislation and their discipline such as measures to remove people's driving habits is the fundamental solution of the roa