Bibliometric indicators are now routinely used to measure the impact of published research. However, used out of context and not augmented by peer review, they can lead to erroneous conclusions. Earlier this year, the Indiana University Faculty Council adopted a policy on the responsible use of metrics while the Association of University Professors supported Rutgers faculty in their fight against the use of metrics which they could not verify to assess their performance. This workshop will provide a forum for discussion of the ethics and best practices of bibliometric evaluation. It will address issues raised by critics of metrics-based assessment and discuss best practice recommendations. This workshop is designed for researchers and resea...
Chapter One from the book, The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact Provides an intr...
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publi...
The quality of scientific evidence is doubly tied with the quality of all research activities that g...
Bibliometric indicators are now routinely used to measure the impact of published research. However...
Bibliometric indicators are now routinely used to measure the impact of published research. However...
Research evaluation has traditionally relied on peer review, which, in the light of limited resource...
Metrics have long been used as an indicator of academic success and as a way to make key decisions. ...
This post presents critical view on practical use of bibliometric methods. There are listed difficul...
Almost everyone agrees that bibliometrics are a bad way to measure the impact of research on societ...
Measuring the impact of research and publications (bibliometrics) has become increasingly common for...
Bibliometric measures are increasingly used in academic funding and hiring situations. Although rath...
The use of indicators and metrics for research evaluation purposes is well-documented, however less ...
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publi...
This talk will discuss how most quantitative approaches to evaluating research do not yet fully capt...
For the researcher who is committed to producing impactful research, who has carefully considered al...
Chapter One from the book, The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact Provides an intr...
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publi...
The quality of scientific evidence is doubly tied with the quality of all research activities that g...
Bibliometric indicators are now routinely used to measure the impact of published research. However...
Bibliometric indicators are now routinely used to measure the impact of published research. However...
Research evaluation has traditionally relied on peer review, which, in the light of limited resource...
Metrics have long been used as an indicator of academic success and as a way to make key decisions. ...
This post presents critical view on practical use of bibliometric methods. There are listed difficul...
Almost everyone agrees that bibliometrics are a bad way to measure the impact of research on societ...
Measuring the impact of research and publications (bibliometrics) has become increasingly common for...
Bibliometric measures are increasingly used in academic funding and hiring situations. Although rath...
The use of indicators and metrics for research evaluation purposes is well-documented, however less ...
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publi...
This talk will discuss how most quantitative approaches to evaluating research do not yet fully capt...
For the researcher who is committed to producing impactful research, who has carefully considered al...
Chapter One from the book, The New Metrics: Practical Assessment of Research Impact Provides an intr...
Traditionally, the success of a researcher is assessed by the number of publications he or she publi...
The quality of scientific evidence is doubly tied with the quality of all research activities that g...