This paper develops the stochastic dominance (SD) tests for risk seekers, We find both MV criterion and CAPM mesures unable to draw any conclusive preference between the returns but our SD results show that spot dominates futures in the downside risk while futures dominate spot in the upside profit. It also shows that the risk-averse investors prefer investing in spot index while risk seekers are attracted to futures index to maximize their utility, In addition, our SD results enable us to conclude that there is no arbitrage opportunity between these two prices and fail to reject market efficiency and market rationality
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using both mean-variance...
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explainthe cross-se...
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
textabstractThis paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and f...
textabstractThis paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and f...
The stochastic dominance (SD) tests for risk averters have been established but not for risk lovers....
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
Investor behavior towards risk lies at the heart of economic decision making in general and modern i...
This paper considers four utility functions - concave, convex, S-shaped, and reverse S-shaped - to a...
This paper applies stochastic dominance (SD) tests to examine the dominance relationships between th...
We apply the stochastic dominance (SD) tests proposed by Linton et al. (2005) and Davidson and Duclo...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using both mean-variance...
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explainthe cross-se...
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
textabstractThis paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and f...
textabstractThis paper examines risk-averse and risk-seeking investor preferences for oil spot and f...
The stochastic dominance (SD) tests for risk averters have been established but not for risk lovers....
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
This paper examines investor preferences for oil spot and futures based on mean-variance (MV) and st...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
Investor behavior towards risk lies at the heart of economic decision making in general and modern i...
This paper considers four utility functions - concave, convex, S-shaped, and reverse S-shaped - to a...
This paper applies stochastic dominance (SD) tests to examine the dominance relationships between th...
We apply the stochastic dominance (SD) tests proposed by Linton et al. (2005) and Davidson and Duclo...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using a stochastic domin...
This paper examines the market efficiency of oil spot and futures prices by using both mean-variance...
We investigate whether risk seeking or non-concave utility functions can help to explainthe cross-se...