In the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of interaction, attacks and supports), we present an axiomatic approach for taking into account a special interpretation of the support relation, the necessary support. We propose constraints that should be imposed to a bipolar argumentation system using this interpretation. Some of these constraints concern the new attack relations, others concern acceptability. We extend basic Dung’s framework in different ways in order to propose frameworks suitable for encoding these constraints. By the way, we propose a formal study of properties of necessary support
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumenta...
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to rep-resent two kinds of interaction between argu-ments: s...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...
In the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of interaction, attacks and su...
peer reviewedCayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex introduce bipolar argumentation frameworks by introducing a...
Different abstract argumentation frameworks have been used for various applications within multi-age...
An argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/interactions), particu...
International audienceThe bipolar argumentation framework (BAF) setting is an extension of Dung's se...
International audienceAn argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/...
Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) encompass both attacks and supports among arguments. We stud...
n this paper, we consider two drawbacks of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex's meta-argumentation theory to...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Transparent reasoning proce...
An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a s...
Both support and attack are essential concepts in natural argumentation. As originally introduced, h...
This paper proposes a new framework able to take into account recursive interactions in bipolar abst...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumenta...
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to rep-resent two kinds of interaction between argu-ments: s...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...
In the context of bipolar argumentation (argumentation with two kinds of interaction, attacks and su...
peer reviewedCayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex introduce bipolar argumentation frameworks by introducing a...
Different abstract argumentation frameworks have been used for various applications within multi-age...
An argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/interactions), particu...
International audienceThe bipolar argumentation framework (BAF) setting is an extension of Dung's se...
International audienceAn argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/...
Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs) encompass both attacks and supports among arguments. We stud...
n this paper, we consider two drawbacks of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex's meta-argumentation theory to...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Transparent reasoning proce...
An essential part of argumentation-based reasoning is to identify arguments in favor and against a s...
Both support and attack are essential concepts in natural argumentation. As originally introduced, h...
This paper proposes a new framework able to take into account recursive interactions in bipolar abst...
The process of arguing is also the process of justifying and explaining. Here, we focus on argumenta...
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to rep-resent two kinds of interaction between argu-ments: s...
Arguably the significance of an abstract model of argumentation depends on the range of realistic in...