Add to ORKGThe aim of this paper is to critically build on Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner’s characterization (2015) of epistemologically detrimental dissent (EDD) in the context of science. We argue that the presence of non-epistemic agendas and severe non-epistemic consequences are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for EDD to obtain. We clarify their role by arguing that they are contingent enabling factors, not stable difference-makers, in the production of EDD. We maintain that two stable difference-makers are core to the production of EDD: production of skewed science and effective public dissemination
Since the early modern period, the vast majority of philosophers who have written on contempt have u...
Conflicts surrounding the development of public lands are on the rise around the world. In the Unite...
Divine command theories come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories clai...
The aim of this paper is to critically build on Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner’s characterization ...
We often think or say that someone was wrong about something but almost right about it or close to t...
There seems to be widespread agreement that there are two modal values: necessity and possibility. X...
The dichotomy between ‘truth’ and ‘falsity’ in relation to memory is difficult to clearly sustain. T...
This article explores different ways to interpret the extent to which (capitalist) critique influenc...
This paper argues that the controversy over GM crops is not best understood in terms of the supposed...
In this paper I elucidate various ways in which understanding can be seen as an excellence of the mi...
Despite the massive state interventions into financial markets following the crash of 2007, the acad...
Dieter Henrich ‘s “Notion of a Deduction” (1989), opened up approaches to both Deductions in terms o...
Two experiments are reported in which people resolve references to sets of entities (e.g. lies) that...
Since the early modern period, the vast majority of philosophers who have written on contempt have u...
Conflicts surrounding the development of public lands are on the rise around the world. In the Unite...
Divine command theories come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories clai...
The aim of this paper is to critically build on Justin Biddle and Anna Leuschner’s characterization ...
We often think or say that someone was wrong about something but almost right about it or close to t...
There seems to be widespread agreement that there are two modal values: necessity and possibility. X...
The dichotomy between ‘truth’ and ‘falsity’ in relation to memory is difficult to clearly sustain. T...
This article explores different ways to interpret the extent to which (capitalist) critique influenc...
This paper argues that the controversy over GM crops is not best understood in terms of the supposed...
In this paper I elucidate various ways in which understanding can be seen as an excellence of the mi...
Despite the massive state interventions into financial markets following the crash of 2007, the acad...
Dieter Henrich ‘s “Notion of a Deduction” (1989), opened up approaches to both Deductions in terms o...
Two experiments are reported in which people resolve references to sets of entities (e.g. lies) that...
Since the early modern period, the vast majority of philosophers who have written on contempt have u...
Conflicts surrounding the development of public lands are on the rise around the world. In the Unite...
Divine command theories come in several different forms but at their core all of these theories clai...