This study examines whether and to what extent the reported gender differences in risk tolerance and information processing influence audit related judgments and decision making. The results indicate that, on average, female auditors have less risky clients in their client portfolios than male auditors and this difference is more pronounced in the high-risk engagement context. The findings of this study suggest that while individual differences could be moderated by a set of professional norms and standards, the very implicit gender stereotypes have a recognisable effect on auditor's client risk perception
This study is a replication and extension of a previously published experiment. We replicate an expe...
Client characteristics, one antecedent to auditor judgments (Hurtt, et al. 2013), have considerable ...
A sample consisting of 183 financial advisors and 290 advisory clients was used to determine the deg...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
The purpose of the current study is to assess the extent to which auditors’ judgments are affected...
We investigate whether an audit partner's gender is associated with the likelihood of issuing a goin...
We investigate whether an audit partner's gender is associated with the likelihood of issuing a goin...
textabstractThe purpose of the current study is to assess the extent to which auditors’ judgments ar...
Many researches on auditor specific characteristic use evidence from psychological researches o...
This study assesses the influence of client gender and auditor gender on auditors' judgments. In an ...
This study assesses the influence of client gender and auditor gender on auditors' judgments. In an ...
This study is a replication and extension of a previously published experiment. We replicate an expe...
This study is a replication and extension of a previously published experiment. We replicate an expe...
Client characteristics, one antecedent to auditor judgments (Hurtt, et al. 2013), have considerable ...
A sample consisting of 183 financial advisors and 290 advisory clients was used to determine the deg...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
In this study, we examine whether and how gender of engagement audit partners affects client accepta...
The purpose of the current study is to assess the extent to which auditors’ judgments are affected...
We investigate whether an audit partner's gender is associated with the likelihood of issuing a goin...
We investigate whether an audit partner's gender is associated with the likelihood of issuing a goin...
textabstractThe purpose of the current study is to assess the extent to which auditors’ judgments ar...
Many researches on auditor specific characteristic use evidence from psychological researches o...
This study assesses the influence of client gender and auditor gender on auditors' judgments. In an ...
This study assesses the influence of client gender and auditor gender on auditors' judgments. In an ...
This study is a replication and extension of a previously published experiment. We replicate an expe...
This study is a replication and extension of a previously published experiment. We replicate an expe...
Client characteristics, one antecedent to auditor judgments (Hurtt, et al. 2013), have considerable ...
A sample consisting of 183 financial advisors and 290 advisory clients was used to determine the deg...