Editors are really biographers of sorts almost all the time when editing ~ the papers of their subjects. All meaningful characters who appear in documentary editions are usually identified in footnotes and head notes, biographical directories, introductions, and sometimes even in indexes. No one knows the subject-the person being studied-as well as the documentary editor. Day in and day out editors pore over their documents intently, attempting to make sense of the interrelationships among all the historical participants. As part of their responsibility, editors explain the intricacies and uncertainties in these relationships
In 2004, documentary theorist Michael Renov described “the recent turn to filmic autobiography” as “...
« The Biographer's subjectivity » The title was first : « Biographer in so far as autobiographer », ...
Documentary editing is a well-developed field connected to the historical and archival professions. ...
Documentary editors are attracted to and often bemused and irritated by biography (and biographers)....
What is done during this time? Generally speaking project directors on documentary editions spend le...
l am living proof that an editor can be a biographer. Whether an editor should be a biographer, or v...
In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and ...
This first convention of our associtation invites observations on the present state of documentary e...
Ever since the pre-meeting of this organization that I attended in Lawrence, Kansas, the association...
Writing biography is often layered in its telling with long lapses of time between research and writ...
The article discusses the role of the archive in biographical narrations and the relationship betwee...
Inspired by Clifford Geertz's concept, the author analyses blurred genres on the example of biograph...
The process of Editing (تدوین) which is organized and ordered, is known as a methodology. When...
This essay is an attempt to retrace some of my pathways through archives in order to understand the ...
Documentary editing has achieved unprecedented importance in American historical scholarship since t...
In 2004, documentary theorist Michael Renov described “the recent turn to filmic autobiography” as “...
« The Biographer's subjectivity » The title was first : « Biographer in so far as autobiographer », ...
Documentary editing is a well-developed field connected to the historical and archival professions. ...
Documentary editors are attracted to and often bemused and irritated by biography (and biographers)....
What is done during this time? Generally speaking project directors on documentary editions spend le...
l am living proof that an editor can be a biographer. Whether an editor should be a biographer, or v...
In the call for papers for this special issue, a lack of dialogue was noted between ‘archivists and ...
This first convention of our associtation invites observations on the present state of documentary e...
Ever since the pre-meeting of this organization that I attended in Lawrence, Kansas, the association...
Writing biography is often layered in its telling with long lapses of time between research and writ...
The article discusses the role of the archive in biographical narrations and the relationship betwee...
Inspired by Clifford Geertz's concept, the author analyses blurred genres on the example of biograph...
The process of Editing (تدوین) which is organized and ordered, is known as a methodology. When...
This essay is an attempt to retrace some of my pathways through archives in order to understand the ...
Documentary editing has achieved unprecedented importance in American historical scholarship since t...
In 2004, documentary theorist Michael Renov described “the recent turn to filmic autobiography” as “...
« The Biographer's subjectivity » The title was first : « Biographer in so far as autobiographer », ...
Documentary editing is a well-developed field connected to the historical and archival professions. ...