In Lund v. Holbrook the Nebraska Supreme Court held that no appeal could be taken until after final judgment from an order requiring a party to turn over documents to his opponent for inspection and copying. The basis for the decision was a statute limiting the appellate jurisdiction of the supreme court to the review of a “judgment rendered or final order.” “Final order” is defined by statute as one which “ . . . in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment.” The same rule would undoubtedly by applied to any other discovery order in Nebraska. This “final judgment” rule exists in some form in almost every state. The application of the rule in Lund v. Holbrook is in line with the rulings of the majority of states as to discovery o...
I. Statutory Appeal with No Statutory Definition of the Scope of Review … A. The Present Rule … (1) ...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin peaceful picketing of an apartment project by defendant labor organ...
This Note examines the history and ambiguous language of rule 56 to determine whether courts have a ...
In Lund v. Holbrook the Nebraska Supreme Court held that no appeal could be taken until after final ...
The federal circuit courts of appeals have generally recognized that a party suffers real hardship w...
The Nebraska Law Review is pleased to continue in this issue a section devoted exclusively to recent...
The Judicial Code provides that the circuit courts of appeal shall have appellate jurisdiction to r...
This article discusses the uncertainty of United States Courts of Appeals jurisdiction over non-fina...
In recent decades, the paths from federal district courts to the federal circuit courts of appeals h...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
Although the nineteenth century\u27s final judgment rule no longer represents an absolute barrier to...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewab...
In 1951, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a summary judgment procedure for the state, patterned afte...
At the suit of the plaintiff, an incorporated religious organization, a permanent injunction issued ...
I. Statutory Appeal with No Statutory Definition of the Scope of Review … A. The Present Rule … (1) ...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin peaceful picketing of an apartment project by defendant labor organ...
This Note examines the history and ambiguous language of rule 56 to determine whether courts have a ...
In Lund v. Holbrook the Nebraska Supreme Court held that no appeal could be taken until after final ...
The federal circuit courts of appeals have generally recognized that a party suffers real hardship w...
The Nebraska Law Review is pleased to continue in this issue a section devoted exclusively to recent...
The Judicial Code provides that the circuit courts of appeal shall have appellate jurisdiction to r...
This article discusses the uncertainty of United States Courts of Appeals jurisdiction over non-fina...
In recent decades, the paths from federal district courts to the federal circuit courts of appeals h...
The Green v. Village of Terrytown case presented to the Supreme Court of Nebraska for the first time...
Although the nineteenth century\u27s final judgment rule no longer represents an absolute barrier to...
By an Ohio statute a final order might be reversed, vacated, or modified on appeal. After verdict wa...
When a trial court sets aside a verdict and grants a new trial, the order may or may not be reviewab...
In 1951, the Nebraska Legislature enacted a summary judgment procedure for the state, patterned afte...
At the suit of the plaintiff, an incorporated religious organization, a permanent injunction issued ...
I. Statutory Appeal with No Statutory Definition of the Scope of Review … A. The Present Rule … (1) ...
Plaintiff brought suit to enjoin peaceful picketing of an apartment project by defendant labor organ...
This Note examines the history and ambiguous language of rule 56 to determine whether courts have a ...