Facing a 72% cut in our monographic acquisitions budget in FY13–14, University of Texas Arlington Libraries turned a crisis into an opportunity. We examined print monographs’ circulation data and discovered the hard truth that the “just‐in‐case” acquisition model is neither sustainable nor serving our users well. Subsequently, our approval plan was put on a virtual mode: no more approval book shipments. We implemented demanddriven acquisition (DDA) programs for both electronic and print books and put broader patron‐driven acquisition (PDA) programs in place to meet our users’ needs
While California State University, Fullerton’s Pollak Library has an e‐preferred approval plan for a...
This paper describes Virginia Tech\u27s implementation of a purchase‐on‐demand (POD) program designe...
For more than a decade, the North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries has had some level of u...
With a flat budget and ever increasing inflation for serials, UTA Libraries chose to embark on a mul...
Next‐generation library systems promise new opportunities to expand beyond our existing methodologie...
E‐books are available to academic libraries through a wide variety of acquisition models. The Univer...
Drawing on our experience with the Primo discovery service at Baruch College, we will discuss the ex...
The libraries in the University of Colorado (CU) System have been using patron‐driven acquisitions (...
From January 2013 to date, the University of California has piloted a system‐wide e‐book demand driv...
This presentation sheds light on a relatively new phenomenon that needs more earnest consideration f...
Just like a car, an e‐book program needs continuous maintenance in order to run smoothly. What can w...
Many libraries use the fear of public outcry as a reason to limit interaction with their communities...
The Liberty University Jerry Falwell Library serves a student body of over 100,000 students, most of...
On October 16, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its opinion dismissi...
The academic e‐book market has undergone significant change in the last five years. E‐book availabil...
While California State University, Fullerton’s Pollak Library has an e‐preferred approval plan for a...
This paper describes Virginia Tech\u27s implementation of a purchase‐on‐demand (POD) program designe...
For more than a decade, the North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries has had some level of u...
With a flat budget and ever increasing inflation for serials, UTA Libraries chose to embark on a mul...
Next‐generation library systems promise new opportunities to expand beyond our existing methodologie...
E‐books are available to academic libraries through a wide variety of acquisition models. The Univer...
Drawing on our experience with the Primo discovery service at Baruch College, we will discuss the ex...
The libraries in the University of Colorado (CU) System have been using patron‐driven acquisitions (...
From January 2013 to date, the University of California has piloted a system‐wide e‐book demand driv...
This presentation sheds light on a relatively new phenomenon that needs more earnest consideration f...
Just like a car, an e‐book program needs continuous maintenance in order to run smoothly. What can w...
Many libraries use the fear of public outcry as a reason to limit interaction with their communities...
The Liberty University Jerry Falwell Library serves a student body of over 100,000 students, most of...
On October 16, 2015, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down its opinion dismissi...
The academic e‐book market has undergone significant change in the last five years. E‐book availabil...
While California State University, Fullerton’s Pollak Library has an e‐preferred approval plan for a...
This paper describes Virginia Tech\u27s implementation of a purchase‐on‐demand (POD) program designe...
For more than a decade, the North Carolina State University (NCSU) Libraries has had some level of u...