Current judicial practice regards the fiduciary duties of corporate officials as running exclusively to the common shareholders, and not to the bondholders or preferred shareholders, or to the corporation as a whole. In this article, the author addresses the question of whether defining the corporation as a whole as the subject of these fiduciary duties would better promote economic efficiency. Ultimately, the author concludes that economic efficiency would be enhanced if the locus of corporate officials\u27 fiduciary duties was redefined as running to the corporation, both for larger corporations with publicly-held securities and smaller corporations whose securities may be more closely held
Corporate law and scholarship generally assume that professional managers control public corporation...
The following article will address the issue of the extent to which minority shareholders should be ...
The inherent conflict between creditors and shareholders has long occupied courts and commentators i...
Current judicial practice regards the fiduciary duties of corporate officials as running exclusively...
To economically oriented corporate law professors, distinguishing between directors\u27 fiduciary du...
The question of how fiduciary duties should be allocated within the public corporation has been the ...
The shareholder primacy norm defines the objective of the corporation as maximization of shareholder...
Under traditional state and corporate law doctrine, officers and directors of both public and closel...
This Article provides a crucial corrective to the “corporate social responsibility” debate, which co...
Book Chapter Julian Velasco, Shareholder Primacy in Benefit Corporations, in Fiduciary Obligations i...
The purpose of this Article is to offer a positive analysis of the common law of corporate managers\...
Corporate fiduciary duty standards are at an all-time low in this country. Ironically, the deteriora...
From the publisher This chapter examines fiduciary duty in corporate law. Fiduciary duty is pervasiv...
Corporate law and scholarship generally assume that professional managers control public corporation...
The following article will address the issue of the extent to which minority shareholders should be ...
The inherent conflict between creditors and shareholders has long occupied courts and commentators i...
Current judicial practice regards the fiduciary duties of corporate officials as running exclusively...
To economically oriented corporate law professors, distinguishing between directors\u27 fiduciary du...
The question of how fiduciary duties should be allocated within the public corporation has been the ...
The shareholder primacy norm defines the objective of the corporation as maximization of shareholder...
Under traditional state and corporate law doctrine, officers and directors of both public and closel...
This Article provides a crucial corrective to the “corporate social responsibility” debate, which co...
Book Chapter Julian Velasco, Shareholder Primacy in Benefit Corporations, in Fiduciary Obligations i...
The purpose of this Article is to offer a positive analysis of the common law of corporate managers\...
Corporate fiduciary duty standards are at an all-time low in this country. Ironically, the deteriora...
From the publisher This chapter examines fiduciary duty in corporate law. Fiduciary duty is pervasiv...
Corporate law and scholarship generally assume that professional managers control public corporation...
The following article will address the issue of the extent to which minority shareholders should be ...
The inherent conflict between creditors and shareholders has long occupied courts and commentators i...