OBJECTIVE: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness and patient autonomy in daily clinical practices. This paper aims to describe how professionals negotiate their role when a pregnant woman asks them to become involved in the decision-making process implied by screening. METHODS: Forty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with gynaecologists-obstetricians (n=26) and midwives (n=15) in a large Swiss city. RESULTS: Three professional profiles were constructed along a continuum that defines the relative distance or proximity towards patients' demands for professional involvement in the decision-making process. The first profile insists on enforcing patient responsibility, wherein the heal...
Objective: to explore routinisation and constraints on informed choice in a one-stop clinic offering...
Objectives: It is generally recognised that choices concerning treatment or screening should be peop...
Of Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of medical ethics—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence...
OBJECTIVE: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Objective: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Objective: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Abstract Background Health professionals are expected...
Abstract Background Patient decision aids (PtDAs) hel...
International audienceOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the understanding of health professionals involved in ...
Abstract Background For pregnant women and their partners, the decision to undergo Down syndrome pre...
Objective: Numerous decision aids (DAs) have been developed to inform pregnant people about prenatal...
Aims. To explore the perspective of midwives offering serum screening for Down’s syndrome.Background...
Objective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and deliver...
Abstract Background While non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy is commercially ...
Patient involvement, in the form of shared decision-making, is advocated within healthcare. This is ...
Objective: to explore routinisation and constraints on informed choice in a one-stop clinic offering...
Objectives: It is generally recognised that choices concerning treatment or screening should be peop...
Of Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of medical ethics—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence...
OBJECTIVE: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Objective: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Objective: Routine prenatal screening for Down syndrome challenges professional non-directiveness an...
Abstract Background Health professionals are expected...
Abstract Background Patient decision aids (PtDAs) hel...
International audienceOBJECTIVES: To evaluate the understanding of health professionals involved in ...
Abstract Background For pregnant women and their partners, the decision to undergo Down syndrome pre...
Objective: Numerous decision aids (DAs) have been developed to inform pregnant people about prenatal...
Aims. To explore the perspective of midwives offering serum screening for Down’s syndrome.Background...
Objective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and deliver...
Abstract Background While non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal aneuploidy is commercially ...
Patient involvement, in the form of shared decision-making, is advocated within healthcare. This is ...
Objective: to explore routinisation and constraints on informed choice in a one-stop clinic offering...
Objectives: It is generally recognised that choices concerning treatment or screening should be peop...
Of Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of medical ethics—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence...