This note introduces the United Kingdom's Feminist Judgments Project and explains its method of (re)writing imagined legal judgments from a feminist perspective. It identifies the ways in which project participants put feminist concerns, feminist theory and feminist methods into legal practice, and considers the value as well as the limitations of this new form of feminist critique and praxis. It concludes by outlining some of the wider impacts and implications of the project
This conversational-style essay is an exchange among fourteen professors—representing thirteen unive...
In this reflection, we want to explain a project in Australia that extends the feminist judgments pr...
The Feminist Judgments Project (“FJP” or the “Project”) rewrites existing judicial opinions from a f...
The Feminist Judgments Project was a collaboration in which a group of feminist legal scholars wrote...
This paper discusses feminist judgments as a specific vehicle for teaching students to think critica...
Feminist approaches to socio-legal studies combine feminist theory with concern about the operation ...
While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors of legal practi...
Hale's dictum about conjugal rights suggests that imagination plays an important role in the propaga...
The Irish project 'Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity'...
This chapter, part of Integrating Doctrine and Diversity: Inclusion and Equity in the Law School Cla...
Judicial decision-making is not a neutral and logical enterprise that involves applying clear rules ...
This book brings together feminist academics and lawyers to present an impressive collection of alte...
Prompted by two of the premises of feminist judgment-writing projects – that feminist judgments are ...
The word “feminism” means different things to its many supporters (and undoubtedly, to its detractor...
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project turns attention to the U.S. Supreme Court. Contributors to this ...
This conversational-style essay is an exchange among fourteen professors—representing thirteen unive...
In this reflection, we want to explain a project in Australia that extends the feminist judgments pr...
The Feminist Judgments Project (“FJP” or the “Project”) rewrites existing judicial opinions from a f...
The Feminist Judgments Project was a collaboration in which a group of feminist legal scholars wrote...
This paper discusses feminist judgments as a specific vehicle for teaching students to think critica...
Feminist approaches to socio-legal studies combine feminist theory with concern about the operation ...
While feminist legal scholarship has thrived within universities and in some sectors of legal practi...
Hale's dictum about conjugal rights suggests that imagination plays an important role in the propaga...
The Irish project 'Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges' Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity'...
This chapter, part of Integrating Doctrine and Diversity: Inclusion and Equity in the Law School Cla...
Judicial decision-making is not a neutral and logical enterprise that involves applying clear rules ...
This book brings together feminist academics and lawyers to present an impressive collection of alte...
Prompted by two of the premises of feminist judgment-writing projects – that feminist judgments are ...
The word “feminism” means different things to its many supporters (and undoubtedly, to its detractor...
The U.S. Feminist Judgments Project turns attention to the U.S. Supreme Court. Contributors to this ...
This conversational-style essay is an exchange among fourteen professors—representing thirteen unive...
In this reflection, we want to explain a project in Australia that extends the feminist judgments pr...
The Feminist Judgments Project (“FJP” or the “Project”) rewrites existing judicial opinions from a f...