A comparison of three dual drainage models: Shallow Water vs Local Inertial vs Diffusive Wave

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from IWA Publishing via the DOI in this record.In this study we compared three overland flow models, a full dynamic model (SWE), a local inertial equations model (GWM), and a diffusive wave model (PDWAVE). The three models are coupled with the same full dynamic sewer network model (SIPSON). We adopted the volume exchange between sewer and overland flow models, and the hydraulic head and discharge rates at the linked manholes to evaluate differences between the models. For that purpose we developed a novel methodology based on RGB scale. The test results of a real case study show a close agreement between coupled models in terms of the extents of flooding, depth and volume exchanged, despite highly complex flows and geometries. The diffusive wave model gives slightly higher maximum flood depths and a slower propagation of the flood front when compared to the other two models. The Local inertial model shows to slight extent higher depths downstream as the wave front is slower than the one in the fully dynamic model. Overall, the simplified overland models can produce comparable results to fully dynamic models with less computational costThis research is partially funded by the FCT (Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology) through the Doctoral Grant SFRH/BD/81869/2011 financed through the POPH/FSE program (Programa Operacional Potencial Humano/Fundo Social Europeu). This study had the support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) Project UID/MAR/04292/2013 and the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Project Susceptibility of catchments to INTense RAinfall and flooding (SINATRA, NE/K008765/1)