(Excerpt) This Note concludes that the Arizona Supreme Court correctly applied the possession test and strongly urges the Supreme Court to address the issue and follow in Arizona’s footsteps. The possession test not only provides the best guidance for both officers and courts, but also provides the most precision and clarity. More importantly, this approach aligns with current Supreme Court case law and conforms to established Fourth Amendment principles. Holding otherwise would gravely undermine policy, disregard current precedents, and undervalue the sole purpose for the Fourth Amendment’s existence: to protect one’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Part I examines the scope of the Fourth Amendment, its reasonable expectation of privacy...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
While there are a great many cases and commentaries treating fourth amendment rights, little attenti...
In 2013, the Supreme Court tacitly conceded that the expectations-of-privacy test used since 1967 to...
(Excerpt) This Note concludes that the Arizona Supreme Court correctly applied the possession test a...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
More than two centuries after it was ratified, the Fourth Amendment continues to protect the “right ...
The initial inquiry a court must make before considering a motion to suppress evidence based on an u...
This Note, by modifying certain aspects of the reasonable expectation of privacy test, offers a theo...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
Part I of this article offers a brief history of the development of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence a...
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. S...
(Excerpt) Part I provides an overview of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable sear...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence governing the Fourth Amendment’s “threshold”—a word meant to refer...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
While there are a great many cases and commentaries treating fourth amendment rights, little attenti...
In 2013, the Supreme Court tacitly conceded that the expectations-of-privacy test used since 1967 to...
(Excerpt) This Note concludes that the Arizona Supreme Court correctly applied the possession test a...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
More than two centuries after it was ratified, the Fourth Amendment continues to protect the “right ...
The initial inquiry a court must make before considering a motion to suppress evidence based on an u...
This Note, by modifying certain aspects of the reasonable expectation of privacy test, offers a theo...
The threat of future terrorist attacks has sped the proliferation of random, suspicionless searches ...
Part I of this article offers a brief history of the development of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence a...
This Note discusses the resolution of that constitutional battle, Maryland v. King, where the U.S. S...
(Excerpt) Part I provides an overview of the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable sear...
Supreme Court doctrine protects two seemingly distinct kinds of interests under the heading of priva...
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence governing the Fourth Amendment’s “threshold”—a word meant to refer...
For decades, the reasonable expectation of privacy has been the primary standard by which courts hav...
For fifty years, courts have used a “reasonable expectation of privacy” standard to define “searches...
While there are a great many cases and commentaries treating fourth amendment rights, little attenti...
In 2013, the Supreme Court tacitly conceded that the expectations-of-privacy test used since 1967 to...