This article examines the paradoxical question of whether the International Criminal Court will require justice at the expense of peace. Notwithstanding the popular catch phrase of the 1990s - no peace without justice \u27 - peace and justice are sometimes incompatible goals. To end an international or internal conflict, negotiations must often be conducted with the very leaders who were responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity. When this is the case, insisting on criminal prosecutions can prolong the conflict, resulting in more death, destruction, and human suffering
The ‘Peace versus justice’ debate has been a central theme when analyzing the politics of internatio...
This paper articulates some of the psychological and philosophical Issues underlying political confl...
This article examine the problems raised by amnesty in the domestic and international legal order in...
This article examines the paradoxical question of whether the International Criminal Court will requ...
This essay addresses the convoluted relationship between international criminal justice and peace by...
Since the International Criminal Court (ICC)’s inception, observers have disagreed about how it woul...
The International Criminal Court (ICC) aims to promote not only justice, but also peace. It has been...
Part of a special issue on the proposed Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes agains...
The newly established International Criminal Court (ICC) promises justice to the victims of genocide...
This article contends that international criminal justice provides minimal general deterrence of fut...
In this article, I address the much-publicized "peace versus justice dilemma" faced by the Internati...
This article discusses an important paradox in international criminal law enforcement. On the one ha...
The Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal introduced crimes against peace and crimes against humanity int...
This Article reviews major categories of existing procedure guiding the transition from armed confli...
Traditionally, amnesty was seen as the substance of peace and there was a presumption of the legitim...
The ‘Peace versus justice’ debate has been a central theme when analyzing the politics of internatio...
This paper articulates some of the psychological and philosophical Issues underlying political confl...
This article examine the problems raised by amnesty in the domestic and international legal order in...
This article examines the paradoxical question of whether the International Criminal Court will requ...
This essay addresses the convoluted relationship between international criminal justice and peace by...
Since the International Criminal Court (ICC)’s inception, observers have disagreed about how it woul...
The International Criminal Court (ICC) aims to promote not only justice, but also peace. It has been...
Part of a special issue on the proposed Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes agains...
The newly established International Criminal Court (ICC) promises justice to the victims of genocide...
This article contends that international criminal justice provides minimal general deterrence of fut...
In this article, I address the much-publicized "peace versus justice dilemma" faced by the Internati...
This article discusses an important paradox in international criminal law enforcement. On the one ha...
The Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal introduced crimes against peace and crimes against humanity int...
This Article reviews major categories of existing procedure guiding the transition from armed confli...
Traditionally, amnesty was seen as the substance of peace and there was a presumption of the legitim...
The ‘Peace versus justice’ debate has been a central theme when analyzing the politics of internatio...
This paper articulates some of the psychological and philosophical Issues underlying political confl...
This article examine the problems raised by amnesty in the domestic and international legal order in...