After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whether extending compensation to the harmful consequences of certain hazardous activities necessarily involves the recognition of a liability for lawful conduct without any link to traditional ideas of state responsibility. Part Two, starting again from responsibility for wrongful acts, will discuss whether raising a new category, the breach of an essential obligation or international crimes, confers not only an obligation to make reparations, but a right, in both the victim state and the non-victim states, to sanction the responsible state
The subjects’ responsibility for violations of their obligations is incident to any legal syst...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
The International Law Commission's decision to maintain Articles 40 and 41 is based on the convictio...
After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whet...
At its fifty-third session (2001), the International Law Commission (ILC) finally adopted a complet...
This article is devoted to the responsibility of the states under international law. It has the anal...
This Article assesses the relation between State responsibility under international law and internat...
The article is devoted to the study of the theory of absolute liability in international law. Since ...
Annexed to GA Resolution 56/83 of 2001, the International Law Commission's Articles on Responsibilit...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The end of the Cold War and the bipolar world order caused a lot of controversial questions about th...
This work studies causation in the law of international State responsibility. It is submitted that t...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
This thesis investigates the often-voiced concern that the expanding activities of international org...
The subjects’ responsibility for violations of their obligations is incident to any legal syst...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
The International Law Commission's decision to maintain Articles 40 and 41 is based on the convictio...
After briefly summarizing the classical doctrine of state responsibility, Part One will discuss whet...
At its fifty-third session (2001), the International Law Commission (ILC) finally adopted a complet...
This article is devoted to the responsibility of the states under international law. It has the anal...
This Article assesses the relation between State responsibility under international law and internat...
The article is devoted to the study of the theory of absolute liability in international law. Since ...
Annexed to GA Resolution 56/83 of 2001, the International Law Commission's Articles on Responsibilit...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The international law of state responsibility determines when states are liable for international la...
The end of the Cold War and the bipolar world order caused a lot of controversial questions about th...
This work studies causation in the law of international State responsibility. It is submitted that t...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
This thesis investigates the often-voiced concern that the expanding activities of international org...
The subjects’ responsibility for violations of their obligations is incident to any legal syst...
There exists a range of situations where non-state actors and states can possibly share responsibili...
The International Law Commission's decision to maintain Articles 40 and 41 is based on the convictio...