In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the amorphous doctrine of comity between nations limited the reach of U.S. antitrust laws where an international cartel had a direct, substantial and foreseeable effect on U.S. commerce (as the statute provided) but where damages were suffered in foreign markets only. The Article challenges the reasoning of the majority, arguing that so limiting the reach of the antitrust laws is not only inconsistent with the statute\u27s intent, but ultimately removes an important source of cartel deterrent
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
In its Empagran decision in 2004, the US Supreme Court decided that purchasers on foreign markets c...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the amorphous doctrine of comity between nations l...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
This article analyzes one of the most contentious issues over the past fifty years in international ...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
In its Empagran decision in 2004, the US Supreme Court decided that purchasers on foreign markets c...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...
In 2004, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the amorphous doctrine of comity between nations l...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
The equivocal language of the 1982 Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act ( FTAIA ) has led to sev...
This article analyzes one of the most contentious issues over the past fifty years in international ...
This comment discusses the Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Hoffman-LaRoche v. Empagran, an a...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
This paper presents two major economic arguments relevant to a decision facing the U.S. Supreme Cour...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
Antitrust is a brief for the uselessness of international law. Notwithstanding the apparent utility ...
In its Empagran decision in 2004, the US Supreme Court decided that purchasers on foreign markets c...
E. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. concerned a private antitrust suit for damages against a g...