This is the second half of a two-part Article focusing on preclusions against successive enforcement of the environmental statutes. Part One of the Article, printed in Volume 28 of this Journal, examined preclusions against citizen suits and argued that because of the theme-and-variations nature of the preclusion language, that language should be read in accordance with its plain meaning. Part Two, published in this issue, studies the restrictions on enforcement actions by the EPA and reaches the same conclusion
Goldstein and Carruth argue that the hazardous air pollutant provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Am...
Governments are environmental actors, both as regulators and as contributors to environmental impact...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...
This two-part Article examines the preclusion device, its legislative history, and the decisions int...
This is the second half of a two-part Article focusing on preclusions against successive enforcement...
Congress sought to attain full compliance with environmental statutes. It reasoned that multiple enf...
This is a daunting moment for the United States environmental movement. Since 2017, it often seems t...
In the situation where the environmental issue is becoming an increasingly addressed issue, and the ...
Until quite recently it has been the accepted view that one of man\u27s chief functions was to contr...
First, the Article describes the enforcement approach being advocated by many states. To some, it re...
Public awareness concerning environmental matters has led to increased governmental interest and inv...
The Supreme Court’s decisions under the pollution control statutes administered by the Environmental...
Since the 1970s, environmental protection goals have gone from general statements of political desir...
Since the 1970s, environmental protection goals have gone from general statements of political desir...
In cases involving both express and implied preemption, the Supreme Court and lower courts have appl...
Goldstein and Carruth argue that the hazardous air pollutant provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Am...
Governments are environmental actors, both as regulators and as contributors to environmental impact...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...
This two-part Article examines the preclusion device, its legislative history, and the decisions int...
This is the second half of a two-part Article focusing on preclusions against successive enforcement...
Congress sought to attain full compliance with environmental statutes. It reasoned that multiple enf...
This is a daunting moment for the United States environmental movement. Since 2017, it often seems t...
In the situation where the environmental issue is becoming an increasingly addressed issue, and the ...
Until quite recently it has been the accepted view that one of man\u27s chief functions was to contr...
First, the Article describes the enforcement approach being advocated by many states. To some, it re...
Public awareness concerning environmental matters has led to increased governmental interest and inv...
The Supreme Court’s decisions under the pollution control statutes administered by the Environmental...
Since the 1970s, environmental protection goals have gone from general statements of political desir...
Since the 1970s, environmental protection goals have gone from general statements of political desir...
In cases involving both express and implied preemption, the Supreme Court and lower courts have appl...
Goldstein and Carruth argue that the hazardous air pollutant provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Am...
Governments are environmental actors, both as regulators and as contributors to environmental impact...
Supplemental Environmental Projects (SUPs) are environmentally benefical projects included in settle...