Add to ORKGOne of the great enigmas of equal protection law is Romer v. Evans. In finding sufficient power in the rational basis test to invalidate a state constitutional amendment enacted by popular vote, the Supreme Court left legal scholars in its doctrinal dust, puzzled over the answers to multiple questions. Was this a new rational basis test? If so, how could one know when to apply it? Had the standard of review for state acts adversely affecting lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans changed? If so, to what? Had Bowers v. Hardwick been overruled? If so, why
In this amicus brief filed in United States v. Windsor, pending before the Supreme Court, amici cons...
In November of 2000, Nebraska joined a growing number of states that have banned same sex marriage b...
In this Article, Professor Bybee uses the debate surrounding Romer v. Evans to reexamine the Supreme...
One of the great enigmas of equal protection law is Romer v. Evans. In finding sufficient power in t...
Recent national events have forced the American public to discuss a subject once considered unthinka...
In this Article, Professor Bybee uses the debate surrounding Romer v. Evans to reexamine the Supreme...
This article argues that while Romer v. Evans marked a victory for gays lesbians and bisexuals, its ...
In many different cases, the Supreme Court and lower courts have used a rigorous form of rational ba...
This thesis will explore the activist direction the U.S. Supreme Court has taken in relation to the ...
We stand at a crossroads in equal protection doctrine. Over the last 20 years, the Supreme Court has...
Identity is incredibly complex when we recognize the spectrums of race, gender, and sexuality. While...
It is commonplace today to associate rational basis review exclusively with groups that are not form...
Historically, the rational basis test has been a constitutional rubber stamp. In Eldred v. Ashcroft ...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Romer v. Evans\u27 has caused both joy and consternation. ...
Implications of US Supreme Court decision to strike down amendment to Colorado Constitution to preve...
In this amicus brief filed in United States v. Windsor, pending before the Supreme Court, amici cons...
In November of 2000, Nebraska joined a growing number of states that have banned same sex marriage b...
In this Article, Professor Bybee uses the debate surrounding Romer v. Evans to reexamine the Supreme...
One of the great enigmas of equal protection law is Romer v. Evans. In finding sufficient power in t...
Recent national events have forced the American public to discuss a subject once considered unthinka...
In this Article, Professor Bybee uses the debate surrounding Romer v. Evans to reexamine the Supreme...
This article argues that while Romer v. Evans marked a victory for gays lesbians and bisexuals, its ...
In many different cases, the Supreme Court and lower courts have used a rigorous form of rational ba...
This thesis will explore the activist direction the U.S. Supreme Court has taken in relation to the ...
We stand at a crossroads in equal protection doctrine. Over the last 20 years, the Supreme Court has...
Identity is incredibly complex when we recognize the spectrums of race, gender, and sexuality. While...
It is commonplace today to associate rational basis review exclusively with groups that are not form...
Historically, the rational basis test has been a constitutional rubber stamp. In Eldred v. Ashcroft ...
The Supreme Court\u27s recent decision in Romer v. Evans\u27 has caused both joy and consternation. ...
Implications of US Supreme Court decision to strike down amendment to Colorado Constitution to preve...
In this amicus brief filed in United States v. Windsor, pending before the Supreme Court, amici cons...
In November of 2000, Nebraska joined a growing number of states that have banned same sex marriage b...
In this Article, Professor Bybee uses the debate surrounding Romer v. Evans to reexamine the Supreme...