In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overturned years of precedent holding that any hearsay statement that is deemed testimonial cannot be admitted into evidence unless the defendant has the opportunity to confront and cross-examine the declarant. Because the Court did not define testimonial, trial and appellate courts have been required to do so. Many Courts of Appeals have held that a statement is testimonial if a reasonable declarant would believe the statement would be used in court. However, in United States v. Gilbertson the Seventh Circuit abandoned the Supreme Court\u27s reasoning in Crawford v. Washington when it held that only communications initiated by the government qualify as testimonial. This article concludes that ...
In response to an article previously published in the Florida Law Review by Professor Ben Trachtenbe...
In Crawford v. Washington (2004), the United States Supreme Court radically altered Confrontation Cl...
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overruled Ohio v. Roberts and adopted new law concernin...
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overturned years of precedent holding that any hearsay ...
The 2004 United States Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington reformulated the standard fo...
Crawford v. Washington, has adopted a testimonial approach to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth ...
In Crawford v. Washington and its progeny, the U.S. Supreme Court retheorized the relationship betwe...
Crawford v. Washington, has adopted a testimonial approach to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth ...
In December 2012, the Florida Law Review published Ben Trachtenberg’s article “Confronting Coventure...
Crawford v. Washington’s historical approach to the confrontation clause establishes that testimonia...
In 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States changed the legal landscape when it decided United S...
Under Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court has created a new interpreta...
The Supreme Court recently returned to the Framers\u27 intent behind the Confrontation Clause and ov...
In Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court sought to clarify its Crawford v. Washington holding, whic...
In Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court sought to clarify its Crawford v. Washington holding, whic...
In response to an article previously published in the Florida Law Review by Professor Ben Trachtenbe...
In Crawford v. Washington (2004), the United States Supreme Court radically altered Confrontation Cl...
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overruled Ohio v. Roberts and adopted new law concernin...
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overturned years of precedent holding that any hearsay ...
The 2004 United States Supreme Court decision in Crawford v. Washington reformulated the standard fo...
Crawford v. Washington, has adopted a testimonial approach to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth ...
In Crawford v. Washington and its progeny, the U.S. Supreme Court retheorized the relationship betwe...
Crawford v. Washington, has adopted a testimonial approach to the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth ...
In December 2012, the Florida Law Review published Ben Trachtenberg’s article “Confronting Coventure...
Crawford v. Washington’s historical approach to the confrontation clause establishes that testimonia...
In 2004, the Supreme Court of the United States changed the legal landscape when it decided United S...
Under Crawford v. Washington and Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court has created a new interpreta...
The Supreme Court recently returned to the Framers\u27 intent behind the Confrontation Clause and ov...
In Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court sought to clarify its Crawford v. Washington holding, whic...
In Davis v. Washington, the Supreme Court sought to clarify its Crawford v. Washington holding, whic...
In response to an article previously published in the Florida Law Review by Professor Ben Trachtenbe...
In Crawford v. Washington (2004), the United States Supreme Court radically altered Confrontation Cl...
In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court overruled Ohio v. Roberts and adopted new law concernin...