The article discusses the reported efforts to improve state capital punishment counsel systems through the use of the American Bar Association\u27s (ABA\u27s) Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases which have apparently been adopted by every active death penalty jurisdiction in the U.S. as of March 2014. America\u27s criminal justice system and ineffective assistance of counsel claims in the U.S. are mentioned, along with various state supreme courts
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...
The ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (“G...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The revised edition of the ABA\u27s Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Couns...
This piece, published in Part 1 of Hofstra Law Review’s symposium marking the tenth anniversary of t...
On February 10, 2003, the American Bar Association approved the revised edition of its Guidelines fo...
An introduction is presented in which the author discusses various reports within the issue on topic...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This paper explains how the standards of practice in the development of mitigating evidence -- a cor...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The article discusses the development of death penalty legal representation guidelines in China base...
The capital punishment system in the United States is broken. Studies reveal growing delays nationwi...
In Strickland v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court issued a seminal holding that single-ha...
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...
The ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Counsel in Death Penalty Cases (“G...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The revised edition of the ABA\u27s Guidelines for the Appointment and Performance of Defense Couns...
This piece, published in Part 1 of Hofstra Law Review’s symposium marking the tenth anniversary of t...
On February 10, 2003, the American Bar Association approved the revised edition of its Guidelines fo...
An introduction is presented in which the author discusses various reports within the issue on topic...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
This paper explains how the standards of practice in the development of mitigating evidence -- a cor...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The article discusses the development of death penalty legal representation guidelines in China base...
The capital punishment system in the United States is broken. Studies reveal growing delays nationwi...
In Strickland v. Washington, the United States Supreme Court issued a seminal holding that single-ha...
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...
This article appears in the Hofstra Law Review symposium issue on the Supplementary Guidelines for t...
The Supplementary Guidelines for the Mitigation Function of Capital Defense Teams are the culminatio...