Add to ORKGThe article discusses several concerns regarding interpretations of the U.S. Federal Rules of Evidence as of 2015, and it mentions America\u27s character evidence rules and the U.S. Supreme Court\u27s ruling in the 1948 case Michelson v. United States which deals with the defendant\u27s request for the court to prohibit customary types of prosecution responses to character testimony. The legal rights of defendants in America are examined, along with cross-examinations and witness credibility
Federal Rule of Evidence 404 severely limits the government’s ability to offer evidence of a defenda...
This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(...
IN DRAFTING the new rules for civil procedure in the federal courtsthe Supreme Court\u27s committee ...
It is a fundamental principle of the American justice system that a defendant should be judged on th...
The accused in a criminal case has the right to offer evidence of a pertinent character trait in ord...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence includes several rules that prohibit the use of specifie...
A central principle of U.S. law is that individuals should be judged in court based on their actions...
Several amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence became effective December 1, 2006. Rule 404, whi...
The Federal Rules of Evidence purport to prohibit character evidence, or evidence regarding a defend...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
The problems of character evidence resolved by the new Federal Rules are problems that involve the...
According to one member of the Advisory Committee which drafted them, the proposed Rules of Evidence...
This Article spotlights the flawed analytical framework at the heart of the federal courts’ approach...
Federal Rule of Evidence 404 severely limits the government’s ability to offer evidence of a defenda...
This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(...
IN DRAFTING the new rules for civil procedure in the federal courtsthe Supreme Court\u27s committee ...
It is a fundamental principle of the American justice system that a defendant should be judged on th...
The accused in a criminal case has the right to offer evidence of a pertinent character trait in ord...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence includes several rules that prohibit the use of specifie...
A central principle of U.S. law is that individuals should be judged in court based on their actions...
Several amendments to the Federal Rules of Evidence became effective December 1, 2006. Rule 404, whi...
The Federal Rules of Evidence purport to prohibit character evidence, or evidence regarding a defend...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
On November 20, 1972, the Supreme Court, pursuant to statutory authority, adopted the Federal Rules ...
The problems of character evidence resolved by the new Federal Rules are problems that involve the...
According to one member of the Advisory Committee which drafted them, the proposed Rules of Evidence...
This Article spotlights the flawed analytical framework at the heart of the federal courts’ approach...
Federal Rule of Evidence 404 severely limits the government’s ability to offer evidence of a defenda...
This article addresses the relationship between two federal rules of evidence: Rules 104(a) and 104(...
IN DRAFTING the new rules for civil procedure in the federal courtsthe Supreme Court\u27s committee ...