Add to ORKGThis short piece considers whether the EU antitrust action against Intel constitutes an example of European regulators attacking a successful US company in order to protect a European competitor, or whether it instead is an example of legitimate law enforcement
Both EU and U.S. law prohibit - in some way or another - the abuse of a dominant economic position a...
This paper analyzes US and EU antitrust policies towards abusive unilateral conduct pursued by a dom...
Competition/antitrust law rules are neccessarry for optimal functioning of the common market with it...
This short piece considers whether the EU antitrust action against Intel constitutes an example of E...
Abuse of dominance is one of the three pillars of competition policy in both the EU and the US. Comp...
Intel, a US-based company, was fined by the European Commission in 2009 for abusing its dominant pos...
The May 13, 2009 decision by the European Commission (\u27EC\u27) holding that Intel violated Articl...
Antitrust is an important area of law and policy for most companies in the world. Having divergent r...
On 20 April 2018 the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and Assonime jointly organised a wor...
The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) new legal attack on Intel threatens to leave the company a ...
Antitrust authorities must decide whether and how to consider the national identities of firms. Auth...
This articles discusses Intel\u27s claim that the EU\u27s fine against it for a competition law viol...
This short piece gives an overview of antitrust actions filed around the world against Intel for all...
The United States and the European Union have spent considerable time and resources pursuing antitru...
This short article applauds the European Commission for holding that Microsoft violated European com...
Both EU and U.S. law prohibit - in some way or another - the abuse of a dominant economic position a...
This paper analyzes US and EU antitrust policies towards abusive unilateral conduct pursued by a dom...
Competition/antitrust law rules are neccessarry for optimal functioning of the common market with it...
This short piece considers whether the EU antitrust action against Intel constitutes an example of E...
Abuse of dominance is one of the three pillars of competition policy in both the EU and the US. Comp...
Intel, a US-based company, was fined by the European Commission in 2009 for abusing its dominant pos...
The May 13, 2009 decision by the European Commission (\u27EC\u27) holding that Intel violated Articl...
Antitrust is an important area of law and policy for most companies in the world. Having divergent r...
On 20 April 2018 the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies and Assonime jointly organised a wor...
The Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC’s”) new legal attack on Intel threatens to leave the company a ...
Antitrust authorities must decide whether and how to consider the national identities of firms. Auth...
This articles discusses Intel\u27s claim that the EU\u27s fine against it for a competition law viol...
This short piece gives an overview of antitrust actions filed around the world against Intel for all...
The United States and the European Union have spent considerable time and resources pursuing antitru...
This short article applauds the European Commission for holding that Microsoft violated European com...
Both EU and U.S. law prohibit - in some way or another - the abuse of a dominant economic position a...
This paper analyzes US and EU antitrust policies towards abusive unilateral conduct pursued by a dom...
Competition/antitrust law rules are neccessarry for optimal functioning of the common market with it...