This article explores when and how punitive damages should be applied in securities arbitration. It briefly outlines the nature of punitive damages and traces the background of securities arbitration. It then proceeds to explore whether punitive damages, in any form permitted in courtroom litigation, should be available for use as a remedy by non-judicial arbitrators sitting in consensual forums involving securities disputes
An award of punitive damages is often the most significant and detrimental part of an award arising ...
A contractualist approach to the question of whether arbitrators may award punitive damages. Address...
Following the emergence of arbitration in the stock market disputes, governments and brokers have tr...
This article provides the first empirical analysis of punitive damages in securities arbitrations. U...
It is often said that the business of America is business, and probably the best exemplifications of...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In 1987 the securities industry achieved a major victory. Until then, because of the Supreme Court\...
There is controversy over awarding punitive damages by arbitration in securities disputes. Securitie...
Moving from the rationale of punitive damages and the equivalence between arbitration and judicial ...
The major advantages of arbitration are that the disputes are resolved more expeditiously and cost e...
Despite some residual image problems, arbitration is far from a modem day phenomenon.2 Aristotle him...
What is the current role of the law in securities arbitration? Given the difficulties investors woul...
Securities arbitration panels have arisen to deal with the rising tide of securities litigation. How...
As the United States Supreme Court has observed, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 2 is something o...
Why do broker-dealers fear a legal system in which the firms\u27 customers have a unilateral right t...
An award of punitive damages is often the most significant and detrimental part of an award arising ...
A contractualist approach to the question of whether arbitrators may award punitive damages. Address...
Following the emergence of arbitration in the stock market disputes, governments and brokers have tr...
This article provides the first empirical analysis of punitive damages in securities arbitrations. U...
It is often said that the business of America is business, and probably the best exemplifications of...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In 1987 the securities industry achieved a major victory. Until then, because of the Supreme Court\...
There is controversy over awarding punitive damages by arbitration in securities disputes. Securitie...
Moving from the rationale of punitive damages and the equivalence between arbitration and judicial ...
The major advantages of arbitration are that the disputes are resolved more expeditiously and cost e...
Despite some residual image problems, arbitration is far from a modem day phenomenon.2 Aristotle him...
What is the current role of the law in securities arbitration? Given the difficulties investors woul...
Securities arbitration panels have arisen to deal with the rising tide of securities litigation. How...
As the United States Supreme Court has observed, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) 2 is something o...
Why do broker-dealers fear a legal system in which the firms\u27 customers have a unilateral right t...
An award of punitive damages is often the most significant and detrimental part of an award arising ...
A contractualist approach to the question of whether arbitrators may award punitive damages. Address...
Following the emergence of arbitration in the stock market disputes, governments and brokers have tr...