Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this article lays bare the inconsistencies in the expected tasks of the Supreme Court. Where some roles of the Court have traditionally been treated as indivisible, examining those same roles separate from one another produces an incoherent view of the Court that is difficult to compromise
From the Founding to the Millennium, the Constitution has often proved more enlightened and enlighte...
Recent scholarship in political science and law challenges the view that judicial review in the Unit...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this...
With the approach of the Bill of Rights bicentennial, this paper takes the cause for celebration as ...
With the approach of the Bill of Rights bicentennial, this paper takes the cause for celebration as ...
When the newly appointed Justices of the Supreme Court assembled in the Royal Exchange Building in N...
This Article concerns the interplay between judicial review and Article V of the Constitution, which...
This Article traces the history of judicial independence from the drafting of the Constitution and t...
This Article looks at a rare part of the judicial role: those exceptional cases when the judge is ca...
The topic of constitutional change, both inside and outside the courts, has long vexed constitutiona...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
The following article is a difficult one. Its unusual style, its sophistication, and its multilayere...
For over one-hundred and fifty years, the United States Supreme Court has been the most powerful jud...
Independence from extrinsic influence is, we know, indispensable to public trust in the integrity of...
From the Founding to the Millennium, the Constitution has often proved more enlightened and enlighte...
Recent scholarship in political science and law challenges the view that judicial review in the Unit...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
Continuing the examination of judicial review conducted around the Constitution’s bicentennial, this...
With the approach of the Bill of Rights bicentennial, this paper takes the cause for celebration as ...
With the approach of the Bill of Rights bicentennial, this paper takes the cause for celebration as ...
When the newly appointed Justices of the Supreme Court assembled in the Royal Exchange Building in N...
This Article concerns the interplay between judicial review and Article V of the Constitution, which...
This Article traces the history of judicial independence from the drafting of the Constitution and t...
This Article looks at a rare part of the judicial role: those exceptional cases when the judge is ca...
The topic of constitutional change, both inside and outside the courts, has long vexed constitutiona...
The three books reviewed in this essay are recent contributions to the growing literature of constit...
The following article is a difficult one. Its unusual style, its sophistication, and its multilayere...
For over one-hundred and fifty years, the United States Supreme Court has been the most powerful jud...
Independence from extrinsic influence is, we know, indispensable to public trust in the integrity of...
From the Founding to the Millennium, the Constitution has often proved more enlightened and enlighte...
Recent scholarship in political science and law challenges the view that judicial review in the Unit...
This paper examines several different theories surrounding judicial review and finds many of these t...
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG